<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>
<div style="direction: ltr;">Thanks for confirming. </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="ms-outlook-ios-signature">
<div style="direction: ltr;">Mankamana </div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 4, 2020 12:28:26 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> dev@lists.frrouting.org <dev@lists.frrouting.org>; Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <mankamis@cisco.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE:Do we have IGMP proxy implementation for EVPN multihoming</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi Mankamana
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I had a quick look at the supported NRLIs in latest FRR master and it seems that there is no support for the new route types in this draft.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>below is the list:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>BGP_EVPN_AD_ROUTE = 1, /* Ethernet Auto-Discovery (A-D) route */<br>
BGP_EVPN_MAC_IP_ROUTE, /* MAC/IP Advertisement route */<br>
BGP_EVPN_IMET_ROUTE, /* Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route */<br>
BGP_EVPN_ES_ROUTE, /* Ethernet Segment route */<br>
BGP_EVPN_IP_PREFIX_ROUTE, /* IP Prefix route */<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-pr</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>