<div dir="ltr"><a href="https://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/bgp.html#clicmd-neighbor-A.B.C.D-activate">https://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/bgp.html#clicmd-neighbor-A.B.C.D-activate</a><div><br></div><div>donald</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:40 AM Richard Klingler <<a href="mailto:richard.klingler@jaxforms.ch">richard.klingler@jaxforms.ch</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Good afternoon (o;<br>
<br>
New to FRR running two VM Debian 12 instances with FRR 10.4.0 for<br>
testing BGP setups.<br>
<br>
On each side I have v4 and v6 peers configured, but v4 is in admin shut<br>
state. But I see IPv4 prefix being advertised over the v6 BGP session.<br>
<br>
Is that a normal behaviour in FRR?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
thanks in advance<br>
richard<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
frog mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:frog@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank">frog@lists.frrouting.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog</a><br>
</blockquote></div>