Thanks for the notes Quentin.

I copy / paste them into new memo on slack and publish it on #meetings channel

Regards

Olivier

Policy on support for EOL platforms

-----------------------------------

- Should we support EOL platforms? Group consensus = No

- Moving forward we will not explicitly support EOL platforms

- Keep these platforms in CI, but remove as soon as it becomes inconvenient to

  maintain

- Seeing as Centos 6 went EOL in May 2017, it is no longer supported; to be

  noted in docs

Kernel minimum version requirement discussion

---------------------------------------------

- What should our policy be on minimum kernel version needed for networking

  features?

- Paul Z: Zebra should warn if a user tries to configure a feature and it's not

  supported

- Martin W: `show features` command to inform user would be useful

- Others: Agreed on both counts

- Donald: If we implement the above, developers should be mindful when

  implementing kernel-specific features to update both of these things and it

  will be something to look for in future code reviews.

Issues

------

Updates in individual issues.

#1777, #1778 - Discussion postponed until Lou is present

#1794 - General group consensus to stick with kernel style in this regard

#1803 - Some people recall this being fixed in the past, Renato to take a look

Pull Requests

-------------

Updates in individual PRs.

- #1711: Namespace VRF now in, thanks Philippe

- #1704: Some packaging nits to fix, then good to go; ETA < 1 week

Topotest PEP8

-------------

Martin & Rafael not too keen on reformatting whole codebase right now due to

activity, but agree it might be worth looking at in the future. See further

discussion here:

https://github.com/FRRouting/topotests/issues/73#issuecomment-368952010