On Mar 28, 2018, at 14:17, Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:Hi Jay,I'd say the same as Philippe. We at Cumulus are looking into the type-1 and type-4 route implementation, but welcome other efforts also.Cheers,Vivek_______________________________________________On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com> wrote:Hi,
You are welcome to bring some EVPN extended features, namely EVPN type
1 and EVPN type 4
Thanks,
Philippe
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Jay Chen <jchen1@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
> Thank you, currently our potential customers seem immediate interest is type-2 (maybe type-3 too). if they need type-1, type-4 probably later phase (for multicast multi-home), we can develop too. We will sync up by then. Currently we just started integrate FRR (POC).
>
> Thanks,
> Jay
>
>
> On 3/26/18, 4:16 PM, "Donald Sharp" <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> The relevant documentation for this is here:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ frrouting.org_user-2Dguide_ zebra.html-23zebra-2Dfib- 2Dpush-2Dinterface&d=DwIBaQ&c= V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj- aXQpuqTCJGs- 93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m= SU_xZPka- A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd- c1WIcU&s= EhNk5Ru9bF27ttPaQDHa0wwdnj9irB s7XMzveLSpXW8&e=
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Donald Sharp
> <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> > I believe some vendors have plans for adding more evpn types. I
> > cannot speak for them regarding their time schedules.
> >
> > For FPM build FRR with `--enable-fpm` added on the configure line.
> > Zebra FPM has two choices for fpm forwarding netlink or protobuf
> > forwarding. If you want protobuf, use '--enable-protobuf` in
> > configure, else only netlink is used as a communication medium. To
> > load the appropriate module use -M fpm:netlink or -M fpm:protobuf
> >
> > donald
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Jay Chen <jchen1@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I got a question about what EVPN route types are supported already in the
> >> latest version. It looks like type-2, type-3, and type-5 are supported.
> >> Type-1, and type-4 are not yet. If it is true, any plan the missing types
> >> are going to be supported?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Another quick question, the fpm/fpm_pb.c file looks empty. Is there a
> >> missing patch need to be patched? It will be very helpful if anyone can
> >> point to a brief example how fpm is used by a switch that has a hardware
> >> forwarding path?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jay
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dev mailing list
> >> dev@lists.frrouting.org
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists. frrouting.org_listinfo_dev&d= DwIBaQ&c= V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj- aXQpuqTCJGs- 93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m= SU_xZPka- A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd- c1WIcU&s=SV_20pt83P- 0JYpAhkGoz0lKCPHRJrjFRI4Flbv6X 8I&e=
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev