Just off the top of my head: 1) Pretty much all command documentation is a simple `This does X` without any discussion of what the feature is trying to do. Actual work done to expand on what the commands are actually trying to do would be more than useful. 2) We are missing a non-trivial number of commands from the documentation. These need to be filled in at a `This does X` level of documentation at the very least (see #1, and this is especially true for BGP ) 3) EVPN is not well documented at all, this could use some serious help. 4) route-maps documentation should be cleaned up and consolidated across all daemons that use them, spelling out the supported sub commands on a per daemon basis 5) Deployment guides would be useful. 6) ripng does not have any documentation 7) OSPFv3 is missing large swaths of documentation donald On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Christoffer Hansen <netravnen@gmail.com> wrote:
Donald,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 18:15, Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
If you or Mike(or anyone for that matter ) would like to spend time helping us in this regards how can I help make this happen?
Do there exists a list of sections in the documentation we know is in the most serious need of being updated?
I am asking. Because I know documentation writing is one thing I can help you with. If I have some general guide lines for which sections needs being updated.