When removing the call into rfapi_vty_out_vncinfo if we are SAFI_UNICAST we move onto the next issue: E AssertionError: Routing Table verification failed for router r1, view 1: E *** actual BGP routing table E --- expected BGP routing table E *************** E *** 4,40 **** E Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete E E Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path E ! 10.0.1.0/24 172.16.1.5 0 65005 i E ! 172.16.1.2 0 65002 i E ! 172.16.1.1 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.0.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.1.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.2.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.3.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.4.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.5.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.6.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.7.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.8.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.101.9.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! 10.102.0.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.1.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.2.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.3.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.4.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.5.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.6.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.7.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.8.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.102.9.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! 10.105.0.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.1.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.2.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.3.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.4.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.5.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.6.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.7.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.8.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 10.105.9.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! 172.20.0.0/28 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i E --- 4,40 ---- E Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete E E Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path E ! * 10.0.1.0/24 172.16.1.5 0 65005 i E ! * 172.16.1.2 0 65002 i E ! *> 172.16.1.1 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.0.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.1.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.2.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.3.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.4.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.5.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.6.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.7.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.8.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.101.9.0/24 172.16.1.1 100 0 65001 i E ! *> 10.102.0.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.1.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.2.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.3.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.4.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.5.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.6.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.7.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.8.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.102.9.0/24 172.16.1.2 100 0 65002 i E ! *> 10.105.0.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.1.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.2.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.3.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.4.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.5.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.6.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.7.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.8.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 10.105.9.0/24 172.16.1.5 100 0 65005 i E ! *> 172.20.0.0/28 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i E E assert 1 == 0 bgp_multiview_topo1/test_bgp_multiview_topo1.py:436: AssertionError =========================== 1 failed, 6 passed in 92.18 seconds =========================== I'm not sure now how to stop the test to allow me to connect to r1 to do a little debugging. Martin is this possible? donald On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
We've changed the output of the show ip bgp. To always display 'type=<route type>, subtype=..' it doubles the output length and additionally it probably breaks end user scripts.
Looking at the called function, the extra information presented here really belongs in a detailed output instead of a 'show ip bgp' output.
donald
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:54 PM, G. Paul Ziemba <pz-cmaster-next@ziemba.us> wrote:
On December 1, 2016 9:16:00 AM Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
Additionally I see lots of unguarded debugs in the vnc code. I believe these need to be cleaned up as well in some manner, thoughts?
I'm coming late to this discussion, sorry. Could you please elaborate on "unguarded"?
cheers,
~!paul -- G. Paul Ziemba FreeBSD unix: 5:56PM up 102 days, 21:35, 7 users, load averages: 0.83, 0.92, 0.99
_______________________________________________ cmaster-next mailing list cmaster-next@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next