On 2/27/2018 2:49 PM, Quentin Young wrote:
There’s two EOL dates in the table. Let’s not pretend that 1 of them is the ’true' EOL date.
+---------------------+----------------------+ | Full Updates | May 10th, 2017 | +---------------------+----------------------+ | Maintenance Updates | November 30th, 2020 | +---------------------+----------------------+
Here is what I propose, since the majority of platforms follow something like the above, roughly:
- “Full Updates” period, where packages are actively updated, new features, new kernels etc - “Maintenance Updates” i.e. only back porting security fixes / critical bug fixes
For whatever the platform in question is, we do the same thing. Continue to ship updated FRR packages for platforms in the “Full Updates” phase. Then once they enter the “Maintenance Updates” phase we freeze the package at whatever version it is, or close to it depending on convenience, and then only back port security fixes / critical bug fixes.
Does this sound reasonable to everyone? At first glance, yes.
But what does this really mean in practical terms, *we* don't expect to support an FRR release for more than say about year right? Are you saying we now need to keep old releases around for as long as we have a platform on which we're doing Maintenance Updates? (For example, 3.0 untilNovember 30th, 2020) What's your thinking / proposal here? Lou On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Right. It says: Maintenance Updates2 <https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product#fndef-a91b3c0c287c782f9af063daff9e64b566d648c7-1> November 30th, 2020
On February 27, 2018 2:20:24 PM Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com <mailto:qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>> wrote:
As Donald said in his email,
We are just trying to match what the EOL is from the centos website itself.
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product
On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
fair point, based on a quick google:
CentOS 6 (released 10 Jul 2011, EOL 30 Nov 2020)
Lou
On 2/27/2018 2:01 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
Isn't that Redhat, not centos 6? Different distributions. We are just trying to match what the EOL is from the centos website itself.
donald
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Thanks for the notes!
On 2/27/2018 12:56 PM, Quentin Young wrote: > - Seeing as Centos 6 went EOL in May 2017, it is no longer > supported; to > be > noted in docs
umm, per https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata Linux 6, EUS 6.7 (ends December 31, 2018) V6 End of Maintenance Support 2 (Product retirement): June 30, 2024
I know of a fair number of folks still using 6.x, I think EOL support is premature. I think FRR support is needed through *at least* the end of this year.
Lou
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org <mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org <mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev