Dear Renato,Thank you for the information. Can you please share us the patch? Probably we shall apply that and test.Best Regards,SutharsanOn Sep 6, 2017 21:45, "Renato Westphal" <renato@opensourcerouting.org> wrote:Hi Bala,
Unfortunately it looks like I updated the changelog before getting the
RFC 4552 code[1] merged in the repository. Long story short: I got
everything working in the last year but my code relies on an external
tool (iproute2) to install the IPSec SAs and policies in the Linux
kernel, and this is not the ideal thing to do. I started converting
the new lib/ipsec.c file to use Netlink instead but for some reason
this work was sidetracked and I never finished it. I apologize for
this mistake and I'll fix the chengelog until I actually open a Pull
Request for this feature. In the meanwhile I can rebase [1] on top of
master and send you a patch if you want. Let me know if that would
help.
Regards,
Renato.
[1] https://github.com/opensourcerouting/frr/commit/aebe82bb2
> ______________________________
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Bala Chandru <chandrubala141@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does FRR 3.0 supports OSPFv3 authentication?
> Though OSPFv3 doesn't have authentication header on its own similar to
> OSPFv2, it should use IPSec for authentication.
>
> Though github claims that it supports RFC 4552.
>
> Reference Link:
>
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/FRR-2.0-%E2%86%92-FRR- 3.0-Changelog
>
> But I couldn't see commands like "ipv6 ospf authentication .." etc.,
> Do I miss something?
>
> Regards,
> Bala
>
>
>
_________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>
--
Renato Westphal
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev