Hello Lou, all, I dont' know if this call is necessary. See below, *coming back to RD/RT discussion* I studied a bit the solutions to deploy BGP using vrf-policy. I came to the following conclusions, that go in the same direction as the FRR people involved in the 7th of february meeting, namely: - adding route-map to vrf-policy, to make it consistent with the other configuration case, ie bgp vrf use case - Also, while I was insisting on having prefix keyword as a configuration element from vrf-policy subnode, I realized it was less important since there were already available commands to set per VRF prefixes, namely add vrf <> prefix <> ... So, to summarise, only route-map should be added. (vrf-policy)# [no] route-map <> I don't think it is needed to have route-map keyword somewhere else ( per label or per RD for instance). Maybe to add route-map behind "add vrf <> prefix <>" command ? To make it clear, all new prefixes matching the VRF will be applied ( if not) the vrf-policy settings, before being applied the configured route-map. And good news, it is already possible inside route-map to set a rt or a soo, or a label. ( at least by configuration, maybe someone tried ?) * other topics indirectly related to RD/RT discussion* There are other separate topics that could be discussed separately, for extensions of vrf-policy services ( and also bgp vrf use case if not already supported): a- support for ECMP ( or not) inside a vrf-policy b- choice of signalisation method to carry vrf information : Encap, VPN, EVPN ( by the way, Lou, I don't find the proposal you were suggesting in a previous github comment). c- support for EVPN specific parameters For the latter point, I propose to initiate some thread by mail to discuss those specific points. OK to pursue in that way? Regards, Philippe On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
On February 14, 2017 7:56:51 AM Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
11 AM EST
https://www.bluejeans.com/9192742159
1) 2.0 rc status
2) Pull Requests Outstanding
3) RD/RT Discussion
As I mentioned in last week's call, I would like to put this discussion cannot be there today. Can we schedule another call on this topic some other time this week?
Lou
Anything else people want to talk about?
donald
_______________________________________________ frr mailing list frr@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/frr
_______________________________________________ frr mailing list frr@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/frr