Here is some information on the Cumulus implementation. We can discuss further in tomorrow's meeting and/or subsequent ones. Functional description: The Cumulus implementation of EVPN is focused on EVPN as the control plane for VxLAN, though it is certainly feasible to extend it to support other encapsulations - e.g., MPLS. It is also clearly a work-in-progress. The implementation is focused on Linux as the network OS; there will be work needed to extend it for FreeBSD or provide the FPM-type interface. The current state of the implementation (end November 2016) allows for MAC learning and exchange but not for MAC+IP. The latter requires some enhancements to the Linux kernel's "ARP proxy" (ARP suppression) capabilities for VxLAN, and this is currently in the works. A precursor to MAC exchange is the exchange of VxLAN topology. This will build the mapping of VNIs to remote VTEPs and is required for handling BUM traffic through ingress replication. The exchange of this topology happens in BGP through the EVPN type-3 route. Currently, this is not configurable (i.e., these routes will always get exchanged). Additional options need to be added to disable this exchange (and hence, possibly, drop BUM traffic), attach to a multicast group or have the ability to go to a service or replicator node. Remote VTEPs learnt by BGP and informed to zebra will result in the "flood list" being setup - by installing the appropriate neighbor entry in the MAC FDB. MACs are exchanged using EVPN type-2 route. Local MACs get associated to the appropriate VNI. Remote MACs learnt by BGP and informed to zebra will be installed in the kernel MAC FDB. Some of the other aspects still in the works are the BGP encapsulation attribute (RFC 5512 - basic code already there in branch from Lou), the PMSI attribute (RFC 6514) and MAC mobility extended community (RFC 7432). All BGP protocol exchanges are as per RFC 7432 and draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay. Handling of access device dual homing (i.e., vPC, MLAG etc. in vendor speak) does not currently intend to use the EVPN type-4 route or EVPN type-1 route and related procedures. Instead, it will rely on the corresponding VTEPs using an "anycast IP" as their tunnel end point. This is in accordance with current industry practice (i.e., Cisco and Arista's approach). Work on L3 multi-tenancy (i.e., Inter-VxLAN routing) is at an early stage. This is where EVPN type-5 routes will be needed along with associating tenants to corresponding L3 VRFs, support for the Router MAC extended community etc. Provisioning/Management: As with other vendor implementations, there is no explicit configuration of a "MAC VRF" - the VNI defines the L2 domain and is the MAC VRF. VNIs (VxLAN interfaces), association of these to a bridge and mapping of access (VLAN) interfaces to the bridge are all supported (done) through existing Linux interfaces i.e., iproute2 or ifupdown2. There are no new Quagga commands to create or update these. The only essential pieces of Quagga configuration needed to activate EVPN (for the current and near-term functionality) are: a) enable EVPN - the current commands for this is "advertise-vni" b) activate EVPN address family for the remote VTEPs (or appropriate BGP peers, if peering is hop-by-hop) router bgp <as> address-family evpn advertise-vni neighbor <nbr> activate With the above configuration, VNIs known to the system will get associated with automatic RDs and RTs. The RDs are formed as "RouterID:VNI" and the RTs (import and export) are formed using "AS:VNI". Configuration options are provided to specify a different RD and/or RT value for a VNI. Whichever parameter that is not user-configured will be auto-derived. The VNI will of course be "active" only when it is known to the system (i.e., provisioned through existing Linux interface). router bgp <as> address-family evpn advertise-vni neighbor <nbr> activate vni <vni> rd <value> route-target import <value> ... route-target export <value> The main vtysh commands currently available to manage/monitor EVPN operation are: show evpn vni show evpn vni <vni> mac show bgp evpn summary show bgp evpn route show bgp evpn route rd <rd> Design description: zebra provides the kernel interface (through netlink) and maintains the VNI information and the MAC table per VNI. It should be considered later if these need to move into a "l2d"; this is best taken up for consideration, if at all, in conjunction with a "vrfd" and an "ifd" so that zebra effectively becomes "rtmd". The VNI hash table is populated with local VNIs which are learnt through existing netlink "link" notifications. The hash table also contains the remote VTEPs which are updated by BGP. Linux currently only supports an IPv4 address as the VTEP IP, so while the code has support for IPv6 address as a VTEP, it is incomplete. To be able to associate local MACs to the correct VNI (if they are associated with a VNI), zebra needs to understand bridges and bridge members and the VLAN to VNI mapping. These are built by listening mostly to existing netlink "link" notifications, however, some notifications related to the AF_BRIDGE family also need to be processed. The "L2" information for an interface is maintained in a structure linked off 'struct zebra_if'. The VNI hash table contains the MAC table corresponding to the VNI. This includes local MACs learnt from netlink "neighbor" notifications (AF_BRIDGE) as well as remote MACs updated by BGP. The remote MACs result in MAC FDB entries being installed in the kernel. When this is extended for MAC+IP, the IP information will result in creation of ARP "suppression" entries in the kernel. BGP also has a VNI hash table that it builds through interaction with zebra. Currently, there is no per-VNI routing table. Instead, EVPN routes (both local and remote) are only maintained in the main routing table where they are organized using a hierarchical radix tree in the same fashion as L3VPN routes and ENCAP routes. This is likely to need change in order to handle various scenarios. The change envisioned is that local EVPN routes will be only present in the per-VNI routing table from where they will be advertised to EVPN peers; remote (i.e., learnt) EVPN routes will be present in the global EVPN routing table from where they will be "imported" into one or more VNI routing tables; the import can/will be done as a separate thread. Thanks, Vivek