Hi Jay, I'd say the same as Philippe. We at Cumulus are looking into the type-1 and type-4 route implementation, but welcome other efforts also. Cheers, Vivek On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Philippe Guibert < philippe.guibert@6wind.com> wrote:
Hi,
You are welcome to bring some EVPN extended features, namely EVPN type 1 and EVPN type 4 Thanks,
Philippe
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Jay Chen <jchen1@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
Thank you, currently our potential customers seem immediate interest is type-2 (maybe type-3 too). if they need type-1, type-4 probably later phase (for multicast multi-home), we can develop too. We will sync up by then. Currently we just started integrate FRR (POC).
Thanks, Jay
On 3/26/18, 4:16 PM, "Donald Sharp" <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
The relevant documentation for this is here:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ frrouting.org_user-2Dguide_zebra.html-23zebra-2Dfib- 2Dpush-2Dinterface&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka- A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=EhNk5Ru9bF27ttPaQDHa0wwdnj9irB s7XMzveLSpXW8&e=
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > I believe some vendors have plans for adding more evpn types. I > cannot speak for them regarding their time schedules. > > For FPM build FRR with `--enable-fpm` added on the configure line. > Zebra FPM has two choices for fpm forwarding netlink or protobuf > forwarding. If you want protobuf, use '--enable-protobuf` in > configure, else only netlink is used as a communication medium. To > load the appropriate module use -M fpm:netlink or -M fpm:protobuf > > donald > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Jay Chen < jchen1@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I got a question about what EVPN route types are supported already in the >> latest version. It looks like type-2, type-3, and type-5 are supported. >> Type-1, and type-4 are not yet. If it is true, any plan the missing types >> are going to be supported? >> >> >> >> Another quick question, the fpm/fpm_pb.c file looks empty. Is there a >> missing patch need to be patched? It will be very helpful if anyone can >> point to a brief example how fpm is used by a switch that has a hardware >> forwarding path? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jay >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> dev@lists.frrouting.org >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists. frrouting.org_listinfo_dev&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka- A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=SV_20pt83P- 0JYpAhkGoz0lKCPHRJrjFRI4Flbv6X8I&e= >>
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev