Donald, before you upload these debian packages, you may want to check this out…

Have you tried to install/run these .deb images? If so, are you observing this too (see further below)?

I’m able to build .deb packages for Debian-Jessie, but typical installation instructions are missing in frr’s debian/rules (e.g. cp /usr/lib/frr/frr /etc/init.d/; update-rc.d frr defaults). In consequence, frr is not initiated as a service, nor we are giving users the chance of doing so, which is something quagga takes care of as part of its dpkg-building process.

As a fix, we could either defer ‘frr.service’ initialization to debian’s postinst-phase (quagga’s approach), or we can go ahead and insert these instructions in debian/rule itself. 

@Martin, do you have any suggestion? I can propose a fix but i’m far from being a deb-packager expert ;-)

$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b -us -uc -d

…

dh_systemd_enable: Could not find "frr.service" in the /lib/systemd/system directory of frr-dbg. This could be a typo, or using Also= with a service file from another package. Please check carefully that this message is harmless.

dh_systemd_enable: Cannot open(frr.service) for extracting the Also= line(s)

dh_systemd_enable: Could not find "frr.service" in the /lib/systemd/system directory of frr-doc. This could be a typo, or using Also= with a service file from another package. Please check carefully that this message is harmless.

dh_systemd_enable: Cannot open(frr.service) for extracting the Also= line(s)

make[1]: Leaving directory '/sonic/src/frr'

...

/Rodny

On Apr 3, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Donald Sharp via dev <dev@lists.frrouting.org> wrote:

From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>

Subject: Re: [dev] FRR 2.0 Package now released in Ubuntu Snap store

Date: April 3, 2017 at 11:50:40 AM PDT

To: Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org>

Cc: JR Rivers <jrrivers@cumulusnetworks.com>, dev@lists.frrouting.org

I have built .deb packages for FRR for ubuntu 16.04.  Do we want to
put them up on the github page?  While we wait for more official
packaging?

donald

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Martin Winter
<mwinter@opensourcerouting.org> wrote:

We don’t have a official .deb or .rpm package yet.

I’m working with Silas (who is way better on deb packages than I am)
to get debian packages fixed. (RPMs should be easier than debian packages)

- Martin

On 3 Apr 2017, at 7:24, JR Rivers wrote:

Any thoughts on RPM and DEB?

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com> wrote:

Great work everyone, and thank you Martin for the update!

The link from your previous email: https://uappexplorer.com/app/frr.osr

shows only download option for arm64. Are the other architectures just
slow to show up?

Cheers,
Jafar


On 4/3/2017 4:40 AM, Martin Winter wrote:

The binary Snap Package for FRR 2.0 is now released in the snap store

Snap binary is currently available for amd64, i386, armhf and arm64 with
ppc64el
probably following in 1..2 days

I’ve also made the associated Snapcraft CI Testplan (and Store
deployment) public as well
(See https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-SNAP and
https://ci1.netdef.org/deploy/viewAllDeploymentProjects.action )

Enjoy,

- Martin

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev