so what should patches go against now, 2.0 or master? On 12/7/2016 7:12 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
I am fine with this. David?
donald
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Martin Winter <mwinter@opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
On 5 Dec 2016, at 7:55, David Lamparter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've just merged Renato's RIP & BGP cleanups, which came with a zebra namespace rework/cleanup.
This was pretty much exactly at the limit of what I think was still acceptable for a "stable/" branch, but I'd like to progress clamping down on the "allowed impact" of changes.
Donald & I are in agreement that, for "stable/2.0", there should be: - no new features I would really like to get the needed (small) changes added to be able to create snap packages. Waiting for Renato on the LDP issue/question on this…
Not sure if this is looked as as a change (and if yes: everyone ok?)
- Martin
- no reworks (Please voice your disagreement if you have any!)
On the other hand, please *do* send: - bugfixes in general - bugfixes for regressions - build system fixes - documentation updates
However, even bugfixes should hopefully get smaller and smaller now. We need to make sure the limes converges towards a release :)
Cheers,
-David
_______________________________________________ cmaster-next mailing list cmaster-next@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
cmaster-next mailing list cmaster-next@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
_______________________________________________ cmaster-next mailing list cmaster-next@lists.nox.tf https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next