This was an intentional design decision at the time of writing pbr from me.  I was not sure if people wanted partial pbr-maps or not.  I could see arguments for both sides so I erred on the side of being too zealous.  If you need different behavior add a knob in that allows it.

donald

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:55 PM Atul Chowdhry <atul77@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Guys, 

I was looking at PBR daemon code and looks like in current code, the whole pbr-policy (struct pbr_map) is considered to invalid if any one of the contained rules (struct pbr_map_sequence) inside the policy becomes invalid.

I cannot figure the reason for this design choice. To me it looks like policy rules are pretty much independent and policy is just a container for these rules.

What am I missing?

I will really appreciate it if anyone can reply to my query.

Thanks a lot in advance.

Rgds

Atul

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev