Vincent,

Nothing in particular, what you see is IANA EVPN route type registry, stuff that potentially would need to be implemented.
Types 6-11 are multicast related and perhaps less interesting for DC focused implementation.

That’s all,
Jeff  

On Mar 29, 2018, at 00:12, Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> wrote:

Jeff,

What do you mean? Anyone is welcomed to provide patch series to be innovative on these topics.

IETF RFC / drafts are welcomed since the are the specs of the implementations but even better having proven code that allows to understand and play with the specs will help to build up solutions. 

I believe FRR has proven and demonstrated that it can be faster to support protocol extensions.

Please?

Thank you,