Regarding ospfv3 authentication
Hi, Does FRR 3.0 supports OSPFv3 authentication? Though OSPFv3 doesn't have authentication header on its own similar to OSPFv2, it should use IPSec for authentication. Though github claims that it supports RFC 4552. Reference Link: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/FRR-2.0-%E2%86%92-FRR-3.0-Changelog But I couldn't see commands like "ipv6 ospf authentication .." etc., Do I miss something? Regards, Bala
Hi Bala, Unfortunately it looks like I updated the changelog before getting the RFC 4552 code[1] merged in the repository. Long story short: I got everything working in the last year but my code relies on an external tool (iproute2) to install the IPSec SAs and policies in the Linux kernel, and this is not the ideal thing to do. I started converting the new lib/ipsec.c file to use Netlink instead but for some reason this work was sidetracked and I never finished it. I apologize for this mistake and I'll fix the chengelog until I actually open a Pull Request for this feature. In the meanwhile I can rebase [1] on top of master and send you a patch if you want. Let me know if that would help. Regards, Renato. [1] https://github.com/opensourcerouting/frr/commit/aebe82bb2 On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Bala Chandru <chandrubala141@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Does FRR 3.0 supports OSPFv3 authentication? Though OSPFv3 doesn't have authentication header on its own similar to OSPFv2, it should use IPSec for authentication.
Though github claims that it supports RFC 4552.
Reference Link:
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/FRR-2.0-%E2%86%92-FRR-3.0-Changelog
But I couldn't see commands like "ipv6 ospf authentication .." etc., Do I miss something?
Regards, Bala
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
-- Renato Westphal
participants (2)
-
Bala Chandru -
Renato Westphal