Invite to Slack channel?
Hello, there! I wonder if I or our domain @apstra.com can get an invite or whitelist to the FRRouting slack channel? We've got a lot of cool stuff to talk about with regards to EVPN and EVPN inter-operability. -- JP Senior | Apstra, Inc c: +1.403.970.4965 e: jp@apstra.com www.apstra.com | Vendor-Agnostic Data Center Network Automation
Invite sent under separate cover. doanld On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:25 PM, JP Senior <jp@apstra.com> wrote:
Hello, there! I wonder if I or our domain @apstra.com can get an invite or whitelist to the FRRouting slack channel? We've got a lot of cool stuff to talk about with regards to EVPN and EVPN inter-operability.
-- JP Senior | Apstra, Inc c: +1.403.970.4965 e: jp@apstra.com www.apstra.com | Vendor-Agnostic Data Center Network Automation
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
A quick question about FRR interfaces. The Zebra get interface information/status from Kernel. In our platform, it is almost impossible to put interface into kernel (due to history reasons people object to do so). Is there anyone else facing the same situation and any suggestions for a work around? Or anything similarly to FPM existing for interface to bypass kernel (from interface manager to Zebra instead)? Thanks, Jay
Lou, looks like you went a bit wild with the Unicode :-)
On May 29, 2018, at 14:22, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
෩抽町᫂訝馩흞纊諷鵯ⶴ퍦롩�歍㓓䰢똔豌齝쬩�뛗�ꊴ潌欭듗쵸�㣓봴㰴휚訠闤ꚶ钨몷Ḁ㔗咢遗儙鴾籗�搮㧛謦㭯欞꧃ꓐ욯ꯟ獍碹쉗矺什Āܷ䑲苝℁崗鱺⯞疼뛓䶚찢똔豌랞櫽흷秛뺶㣣궓맭봱겶퍟㗣縸Đ鉹ꥢ햪졚�귗鶻竳蜯麉�ਨ艗鲢欚귍듗괼�阨畼ꂍ△㾑뗛煘혪᷍⫴蘥뒓﹄䷴庲퐇熙绪奤亢齁ᚓ볧홡↺κ薁蜝奻ష쩅飾��픰㖁⻦㛏尟읠Ό챔➞眎盯洌帨宩ꖉ�ᇘ㉩塷૭��梱ř弾烤譒捱�삿ѳ鬬褈��儵눱騤듏꽇⍰⃭ꏅႣ錟�ꬢꘙ㶃㨏柖歰ᬍ뤧海춱톎꒾᪡裖玡凊轏䓜榑ꘒ㛈꿯䜆㑏늰箶ࡊ㳞ူ끉惧괼刽耄䈱樇銊뛪�嚫놫Ⅻ湺犷ꕫឝﺷꕫឝ瘊⢂垜ꉫ᪭춴㳗ꡬ穷庭ꊻⶡ쨧뗩뚧뇷ꭺ眨瘩⬭닦뢛穘겶ឥꙘ겶騬뙘겵ꫜ蘫�⬭멻윫覷ꖊ쭢皚�鷇겹룞狗⢞뙖Ꞃ稩饲뚉ꊙ껈ꢞ궨ẞ흚뗩麲욠稧微覫秷ꭺ眞닚ᶒ⦬訉�檷᪺�默鱪�麷겺孬減я�┍皘氒泎⡲紁댴쎚鲅덩နꄱ듻띈뒯ਫ਼㔉煲踭▵뀶瞷洒袠ꨚꚾᨔ☚퓣ځ⫀䎨㒀㙩夿�䷋趞枪蛈笂㺁쓐郌覐䨉聣揝賋鳸ۢ硕튧팆㫸�늁訾繢颢髧눮렕㾋퐊霆ྭ⸛ᣍᐔ惩䑆Z䑝砕⫻쪳眪셅趵礙䶸筠郓꤃覤觿鰍蒸塏�磥◡䡇隓噙㌗ꙣ귀㟢霌⨓䶽ↆ랉䀀緟쬻稟㸈婛ỎΏꝋ㿦껩Ფ㣔喨ퟢ⍤爑、ႀ뫘庞�櫘ꢝឬ멛沋妱芊ₕ駙⊚瞮뚶ꕮ蝲薫ⅶ❧ꋛ�⟲藦鵺뢥榹�槗ꮱ힟櫩涅窶숵쳗⢂ⲥ署니⢢फ़犉鶢暢麇�멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ݞ눨❪ힽ뷟鷻톫⥺릢뛗鶱窻⚶馚詗杞붺⺝재阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脗궺맏櫘嵺멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ў燨꽹ퟫꉩ抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ▊쭬纺�芊붽�벦옊⢂垜ꉬ⊶ᄒㄳ튉�겋滽㢢⛶듗촹�磟踸뷪觓ⴭ癲⩡窱Ȍ焑䠀ы嶼ᠣሜඹ궳嶼}뱎닛䵼힍贻퍃썍វ稫�⏅ꖫⲂ訠闧⢙�権溋ꝱ請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠痫⊂皭竍篛��᪲鞫騫浹�鷗ꭲ增默꧗붽�藩욭誉텺쮥뛉놂訠闧⢙�驷꺶뚥溇犅ꬡ瘧枢�긧窸ꕩ맧竘幩뇗齪藦鵺뛂㗌휨般ꗺ媲젨ꈉ干覝ꉦꊞ蟝競眞뉘겶쟫꺋궊砨긇庲⠧櫗곗붽�ꬩ窹ꊶ힝뇩�묦뚙骊埫ꉧ庽먮鷇겖⬭뇺鸊⮁វ稫�驚ᱪ塨닝慺娥請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠漩抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸり�뉫椓ᢦ㙺篞隊幾먦痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ≷埍顛듓䴱グ鎹ㆬ뛓張㗓临턗鱺⯞痺训溋ꝶ쬹톹湺ᨬ뗊⛫붴㥯⥢닛ᾮ먮똩렰諘庲歩넲틗愂ᅈ䭮稘⌒ᰍﳣ湺ጘꛣ츶穻�詞纺⚕랫自맧竘鷕ᛝ㓓䱆�阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脻黛팚쭭㗳廷瓣䴑秇ꊽ꺉鲚వ➝閬麭쨦멹➣৵폝㗡베ꚺ㇋妚詛꞉癖뉺뜨飺ⲵ숫愑⌓㸧砈彺ힰ㬇럨귗꾖⬭뇺鸊⮁㮞�᫋洵盛趴㑞燨꽹ퟫꉦ絷湛麆謭犉뫷콷흝睯✦뉫槂⭡ᄣጾ❍魳彍쩀扺脶淍紜焕㮞�᫋洵盗巴ᜂꊸ귉រ늉샊ꊂ皭몷꿕ꫬ櫈嫛麪登㾷᭜귩嫅귩嫅閦痧�孡ઉ筓궩鷊ᶊ砂ꉻ庞퓲ꗢ❅줺ఠ섕窻⊢烚뗣Ẳ욠碀얮覑秷ꭺ眞넺ኹ룞狔麝䗪旉㨂瀪➵‰ꢞ됷걲뢩똪❅黐�뇩먦䗫ẞ풞鷗ꭅ黔黐鱅黓Ẳ욠碀쮊쭈璸겴瞥꒸겵䧬릻Ხ⛞⸫ⵊ犸魸뢬듺Ⲵ뢬듬❺닢닐⭲禸䃇軇ᱵ憈俅미ᎎ⏲ꜞ୯᪉堩擖ᄒ饮龡웂㗌휨舺렦灝͠ᛁᆧ䝸ﮁ䀰엢評琊쨟⟚䢲騋悳⸔ಫ꠨嶇枩덒䳴騦夨ᰞ쫹Ꮟ珽㖚ℝ焲㡔풟纔♌�츔㯖秇ꊽ꺉ꦢ襵퍍秳굴휆겅휟誋⽺뢳ꉹ�崴힟㫗䵸㚅𥉉벛ꌝ륮稚ⲵ쨦숫慺즭ꛆ錭⯵�茜䑒漆ࣄ蜃湺흯ӆ⦸庞ꊗ龮覥淪륚湹�❵糙뢣䴶Ⲡ뚽飼痫쭬纺�芊닛䵼힝뛣洺퍄請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠䗧�竀耔郾秢飛੮ս柠�꙲綴ꝅ괲ꨎꃇ솑푅鼕渉骊堦権岢悀⯟㷉郒︧翏釩㋕劇ᴦ✛삞쒱栚谦権悙ꢥ犉蓓퀽됄⸸ď鄅싷烻�楪娚雚❺�깋Ტ浺�孭뼝�뛷�㣩ﶼ�︸榧巛갢鷗⢘嫨颺⸅窹孺렞깖鮞瞭ⱪވ෧>鳫減拾瞼㧳黝홖鮞瞭ණ幎닛䵼ힽ뛣崸퍅ⱺ뀠穻䲣㢥閯六梧皌ⰵ㵴텣雫諯ٹ줨ュ㗓䵴픸溝渪�鶼탂垫눪⟗䈧䗪旉㨵鵭뛼矍뭽웛�㓣ꟶ孳쟸齫콵殎ᵷ溰詷岢您黗Ꞵ뚧苦ꁹ䥰➶‛뫇鎆⬡禧庯ڬ槗并�궧⑩뮬窙幪잢鷉湵숫慪粚滫ậ껕삞�滫Ḿ뢦檼螢쭧橧鮣᷵�湺ᨬ뗊♜৭蠆計Ꝫ僨馨Ꞗ⬭뇺鸊⮁瀧똠ᮺ잎긨⊝ꭨ꿰骖垫傀8胸뿣뵶尉ۮ뇤麝Ǘ歺쬃ꉦꊞ嚛鹷굜ᖡ諗ꖊ쭧ꅴꢺ뜞瓓幼㕝⨮귇謶藄옩蠏埍鮊㓓拊୫흊讫燥튢砊璨몷Ḏ⫗䪋ꭱ鷗ꮦ訥흍㗧캵퍜᪲縪ⲽ캉툏뾭痓䵹瓗躸튢砋궆回긇ꮕꛧ鷫園暢鐪⺞�䪋ꭱꖱ薉릵붉ꓭ놅覹떽覤뷠쳄첹覱햕ꆽ췐릍붴ᜮ蜚鐺♪⧲竄깮㞜딗鵺븫庶蒥槉ᲅꧧ穕셹藪�請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠峆ꊖ暧嗪觶흟ྭ痩�墬뒸겴蝅䔚⺶⧠痫�試穻斊쭝竹抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸஊ쭔黋鮱쫢淨涶鬿﹘겶쟫꺋궊砨긏�黏�連詛桵窫麲�닛ᾮ먮똩렬릸��닦뢛碸겴蘫��抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ㾦⩞깦ꊗ뿲폨닙骊孨痫쭬纺�芊⬭ᷩ榙ꢥ뚇庾랪맫ⶖ⬭뇺鸊⮂쮛跧ⶅ⸫ⵊ犸魺᭭ꛏヨ⬭뇺鸊⮃異님Ꝿ违竹骊孨痫ꮞ닙抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸⲹ룞狛윫覷芢筞黔笟窱❲蝢鸆�ઉ筓쪗굻Ꙗꊝ졚껇궺ᚊퟥꌇ鴒뫨껄ꋩ�쥢닛ᾮ먮똩렒穷庭痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸʂ鏛蠍䯌蹋첌ࠍ二่ᐓ䬈ᖚ官�鴈ኘ岙ᩛ蠝��亂辈ᔙ嬛ࠝᯈṛ�蠜ᥛ�᥈ᴚᥞ䠘岙䠝��쮈ዙ岛饛࠙驜鳝ஂ醕퉕젒䠙ᩜ𦒙奈ୈቈᴚᩛ髈ᆔ针᳚ᯝ嬙࠘嬛ᯝ젙鯜蠙ᩙ香岙宝ࠝ峘姙䠛�ᩛ�젂譋䠘宙ࠑ鐓䠘宙ࠕ鎐젘�蠙ᥙ驛驝ᥛṈ᳝尜ᯜ鴈ᴚᩜ쮰ꠈኝ峝ࠛ幈ᯜᩛ驛�讋节錛�节韗ퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟂ餙嶈᭘婛ᩛ駈ᬚ峝ʙᥝ逛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�슚ᴝᰜ캋쯛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�쯛ᩜ�宙鯋�嶂耨⤽뢀풼죤볈샄퓨샤腁㒰腙ꖹ趕말脩藉醥뢁�뷑铨⣸腑閱낁톼臥뷕좁솕뷁놔臑ꆕ藉钁�붹鲸脭闉릕낁馥짍킸⤙崥岁⒁醥춅鷉閔肴脤臑ꆥ리脙䥈臍ꆽ햱邁薱놽�馽좁醥香闉閹킁헍薝钁뷁톥붹첀⢴뒁薹邁㒁薹邁夹ಁ超뢁醕馥릥톕뇤臍헁솽짐臑ꆥ첻脩헍킁뗤膽솥릥붸뢸련⤱뷔⠨⥽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絼⦑闘膵薥놥릜膱ꗍ퀩醕�놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鰩ꇑ퇁쳨벽놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鲽놥췑ꖹ馼붑闘�
wow!!! let's see if this is any better! On 5/29/2018 5:09 PM, Vincent Jardin wrote:
Tell to your people they are wrong. Kernel first. FWIW I disagree - I think FRR should allow for different usage options -- and FPM and VNC can definitely support this. Just my opinion...
Lou On 5/29/2018 5:40 PM, Alistair Woodman wrote:
Lou, looks like you went a bit wild with the Unicode :-)
On May 29, 2018, at 14:22, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
෩抽町᫂訝馩흞纊諷鵯ⶴ퍦롩�歍㓓䰢똔豌齝쬩�뛗�ꊴ潌欭듗쵸�㣓봴㰴휚訠闤ꚶ钨몷Ḁ㔗咢遗儙鴾籗�搮㧛謦㭯欞꧃ꓐ욯ꯟ獍碹쉗矺什Āܷ䑲苝℁崗鱺⯞疼뛓䶚찢똔豌랞櫽흷秛뺶㣣궓맭봱겶퍟㗣縸Đ鉹ꥢ햪졚�귗鶻竳蜯麉�ਨ艗鲢欚귍듗괼�阨畼ꂍ△㾑뗛煘혪᷍⫴蘥뒓﹄䷴庲퐇熙绪奤亢齁ᚓ볧홡↺κ薁蜝奻ష쩅飾��픰㖁⻦㛏尟읠Ό챔➞眎盯洌帨宩ꖉ�ᇘ㉩塷૭��梱ř弾烤譒捱�삿ѳ鬬褈��儵눱騤듏꽇⍰⃭ꏅႣ錟�ꬢꘙ㶃㨏柖歰ᬍ뤧海춱톎꒾᪡裖玡凊轏䓜榑ꘒ㛈꿯䜆㑏늰箶ࡊ㳞ူ끉惧괼刽耄䈱樇銊뛪�嚫놫Ⅻ湺犷ꕫឝﺷꕫឝ瘊⢂垜ꉫ᪭춴㳗ꡬ穷庭ꊻⶡ쨧뗩뚧뇷ꭺ眨瘩⬭닦뢛穘겶ឥꙘ겶騬뙘겵ꫜ蘫�⬭멻윫覷ꖊ쭢皚�鷇겹룞狗⢞뙖Ꞃ稩饲뚉ꊙ껈ꢞ궨ẞ흚뗩麲욠稧微覫秷ꭺ眞닚ᶒ⦬訉�檷᪺�默鱪�麷겺孬減я�┍皘氒泎⡲紁댴쎚鲅덩နꄱ듻띈뒯ਫ਼㔉煲踭▵뀶瞷洒袠ꨚꚾᨔ☚퓣ځ⫀䎨㒀㙩夿�䷋趞枪蛈笂㺁쓐郌覐䨉聣揝賋鳸ۢ硕튧팆㫸�늁訾繢颢髧눮렕㾋퐊霆ྭ⸛ᣍᐔ惩䑆Z䑝砕⫻쪳眪셅趵礙䶸筠郓꤃覤觿鰍蒸塏�磥◡䡇隓噙㌗ꙣ귀㟢霌⨓䶽ↆ랉䀀緟쬻稟㸈婛ỎΏꝋ㿦껩Ფ㣔喨ퟢ⍤爑、ႀ뫘庞�櫘ꢝឬ멛沋妱芊ₕ駙⊚瞮뚶ꕮ蝲薫ⅶ❧ꋛ�⟲藦鵺뢥榹�槗ꮱ힟櫩涅窶숵쳗⢂ⲥ署니⢢फ़犉鶢暢麇�멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ݞ눨❪ힽ뷟鷻톫⥺릢뛗鶱窻⚶馚詗杞붺⺝재阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脗궺맏櫘嵺멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ў燨꽹ퟫꉩ抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ▊쭬纺�芊붽�벦옊⢂垜ꉬ⊶ᄒㄳ튉�겋滽㢢⛶듗촹�磟踸뷪觓ⴭ癲⩡窱Ȍ焑䠀ы嶼ᠣሜඹ궳嶼}뱎닛䵼힍贻퍃썍វ稫�⏅ꖫⲂ訠闧⢙�権溋ꝱ請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠痫⊂皭竍篛��᪲鞫騫浹�鷗ꭲ增默꧗붽�藩욭誉텺쮥뛉놂訠闧⢙�驷꺶뚥溇犅ꬡ瘧枢�긧窸ꕩ맧竘幩뇗齪藦鵺뛂㗌휨般ꗺ媲젨ꈉ干覝ꉦꊞ蟝競眞뉘겶쟫꺋궊砨긇庲⠧櫗곗붽�ꬩ窹ꊶ힝뇩�묦뚙骊埫ꉧ庽먮鷇겖⬭뇺鸊⮁វ稫�驚ᱪ塨닝慺娥請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠漩抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸり�뉫椓ᢦ㙺篞隊幾먦痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ≷埍顛듓䴱グ鎹ㆬ뛓張㗓临턗鱺⯞痺训溋ꝶ쬹톹湺ᨬ뗊⛫붴㥯⥢닛ᾮ먮똩렰諘庲歩넲틗愂ᅈ䭮稘⌒ᰍﳣ湺ጘꛣ츶穻�詞纺⚕랫自맧竘鷕ᛝ㓓䱆�阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脻黛팚쭭㗳廷瓣䴑秇ꊽ꺉鲚వ➝閬麭쨦멹➣৵폝㗡베ꚺ㇋妚詛꞉癖뉺뜨飺ⲵ숫愑⌓㸧砈彺ힰ㬇럨귗꾖⬭뇺鸊⮁㮞�᫋洵盛趴㑞燨꽹ퟫꉦ絷湛麆謭犉뫷콷흝睯✦뉫槂⭡ᄣጾ❍魳彍쩀扺脶淍紜焕㮞�᫋洵盗巴ᜂꊸ귉រ늉샊ꊂ皭몷꿕ꫬ櫈嫛麪登㾷᭜귩嫅귩嫅閦痧�孡ઉ筓궩鷊ᶊ砂ꉻ庞퓲ꗢ❅줺ఠ섕窻⊢烚뗣Ẳ욠碀얮覑秷ꭺ眞넺ኹ룞狔麝䗪旉㨂瀪➵‰ꢞ됷걲뢩똪❅黐�뇩먦䗫ẞ풞鷗ꭅ黔黐鱅黓Ẳ욠碀쮊쭈璸겴瞥꒸겵䧬릻Ხ⛞⸫ⵊ犸魸뢬듺Ⲵ뢬듬❺닢닐⭲禸䃇軇ᱵ憈俅미ᎎ⏲ꜞ୯᪉堩擖ᄒ饮龡웂㗌휨舺렦灝͠ᛁᆧ䝸ﮁ䀰엢評琊쨟⟚䢲騋悳⸔ಫ꠨嶇枩덒䳴騦夨ᰞ쫹Ꮟ珽㖚ℝ焲㡔풟纔♌�츔㯖秇ꊽ꺉ꦢ襵퍍秳굴휆겅휟誋⽺뢳ꉹ�崴힟㫗䵸㚅𥉉벛ꌝ륮稚ⲵ쨦숫慺즭ꛆ錭⯵�茜䑒漆ࣄ蜃湺흯ӆ⦸庞ꊗ龮覥淪륚湹�❵糙뢣䴶Ⲡ뚽飼痫쭬纺�芊닛䵼힝뛣洺퍄請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠䗧�竀耔郾秢飛੮ս柠�꙲綴ꝅ괲ꨎꃇ솑푅鼕渉骊堦権岢悀⯟㷉郒︧翏釩㋕劇ᴦ✛삞쒱栚谦権悙ꢥ犉蓓퀽됄⸸ď鄅싷烻�楪娚雚❺�깋Ტ浺�孭뼝�뛷�㣩ﶼ�︸榧巛갢鷗⢘嫨颺⸅窹孺렞깖鮞瞭ⱪވ෧>鳫減拾瞼㧳黝홖鮞瞭ණ幎닛䵼ힽ뛣崸퍅ⱺ뀠穻䲣㢥閯六梧皌ⰵ㵴텣雫諯ٹ줨ュ㗓䵴픸溝渪�鶼탂垫눪⟗䈧䗪旉㨵鵭뛼矍뭽웛�㓣ꟶ孳쟸齫콵殎ᵷ溰詷岢您黗Ꞵ뚧苦ꁹ䥰➶‛뫇鎆⬡禧庯ڬ槗并�궧⑩뮬窙幪잢鷉湵숫慪粚滫ậ껕삞�滫Ḿ뢦檼螢쭧橧鮣᷵�湺ᨬ뗊♜৭蠆計Ꝫ僨馨Ꞗ⬭뇺鸊⮁瀧똠ᮺ잎긨⊝ꭨ꿰骖垫傀8胸뿣뵶尉ۮ뇤麝Ǘ歺쬃ꉦꊞ嚛鹷굜ᖡ諗ꖊ쭧ꅴꢺ뜞瓓幼㕝⨮귇謶藄옩蠏埍鮊㓓拊୫흊讫燥튢砊璨몷Ḏ⫗䪋ꭱ鷗ꮦ訥흍㗧캵퍜᪲縪ⲽ캉툏뾭痓䵹瓗躸튢砋궆回긇ꮕꛧ鷫園暢鐪⺞�䪋ꭱꖱ薉릵붉ꓭ놅覹떽覤뷠쳄첹覱햕ꆽ췐릍붴ᜮ蜚鐺♪⧲竄깮㞜딗鵺븫庶蒥槉ᲅꧧ穕셹藪�請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠峆ꊖ暧嗪觶흟ྭ痩�墬뒸겴蝅䔚⺶⧠痫�試穻斊쭝竹抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸஊ쭔黋鮱쫢淨涶鬿﹘겶쟫꺋궊砨긏�黏�連詛桵窫麲�닛ᾮ먮똩렬릸��닦뢛碸겴蘫��抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ㾦⩞깦ꊗ뿲폨닙骊孨痫쭬纺�芊⬭ᷩ榙ꢥ뚇庾랪맫ⶖ⬭뇺鸊⮂쮛跧ⶅ⸫ⵊ犸魺᭭ꛏヨ⬭뇺鸊⮃異님Ꝿ违竹骊孨痫ꮞ닙抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸⲹ룞狛윫覷芢筞黔笟窱❲蝢鸆�ઉ筓쪗굻Ꙗꊝ졚껇궺ᚊퟥꌇ鴒뫨껄ꋩ�쥢닛ᾮ먮똩렒穷庭痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸʂ鏛蠍䯌蹋첌ࠍ二่ᐓ䬈ᖚ官�鴈ኘ岙ᩛ蠝��亂辈ᔙ嬛ࠝᯈṛ�蠜ᥛ�᥈ᴚᥞ䠘岙䠝��쮈ዙ岛饛࠙驜鳝ஂ醕퉕젒䠙ᩜ𦒙奈ୈቈᴚᩛ髈ᆔ针᳚ᯝ嬙࠘嬛ᯝ젙鯜蠙ᩙ香岙宝ࠝ峘姙䠛�ᩛ�젂譋䠘宙ࠑ鐓䠘宙ࠕ鎐젘�蠙ᥙ驛驝ᥛṈ᳝尜ᯜ鴈ᴚᩜ쮰ꠈኝ峝ࠛ幈ᯜᩛ驛�讋节錛�节韗ퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟂ餙嶈᭘婛ᩛ駈ᬚ峝ʙᥝ逛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�슚ᴝᰜ캋쯛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�쯛ᩜ�宙鯋�嶂耨⤽뢀풼죤볈샄퓨샤腁㒰腙ꖹ趕말脩藉醥뢁�뷑铨⣸腑閱낁톼臥뷕좁솕뷁놔臑ꆕ藉钁�붹鲸脭闉릕낁馥짍킸⤙崥岁⒁醥춅鷉閔肴脤臑ꆥ리脙䥈臍ꆽ햱邁薱놽�馽좁醥香闉閹킁헍薝钁뷁톥붹첀⢴뒁薹邁㒁薹邁夹ಁ超뢁醕馥릥톕뇤臍헁솽짐臑ꆥ첻脩헍킁뗤膽솥릥붸뢸련⤱뷔⠨⥽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絼⦑闘膵薥놥릜膱ꗍ퀩醕�놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鰩ꇑ퇁쳨벽놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鲽놥췑ꖹ馼붑闘�
For what it worth, both messages from Lou showed up fine on my end. Something went wrong at Alistair's mail server/client. Or the two mail server just didn't like each other, or the message lost its mind in its way :-) --Jafar On 5/29/2018 4:48 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
wow!!! let's see if this is any better!
On 5/29/2018 5:09 PM, Vincent Jardin wrote: > Tell to your people they are wrong. Kernel first. FWIW I disagree - I think FRR should allow for different usage options -- and FPM and VNC can definitely support this. Just my opinion...
Lou
On 5/29/2018 5:40 PM, Alistair Woodman wrote:
Lou, looks like you went a bit wild with the Unicode :-)
On May 29, 2018, at 14:22, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
෩抽町᫂訝馩흞纊諷鵯ⶴ퍦롩�歍㓓䰢똔豌齝쬩�뛗�ꊴ潌欭듗쵸�㣓봴㰴휚訠闤ꚶ钨몷Ḁ㔗咢遗儙鴾籗�搮㧛謦㭯欞꧃ꓐ욯ꯟ獍碹쉗矺什Āܷ䑲苝℁崗鱺⯞疼뛓䶚찢똔豌랞櫽흷秛뺶㣣궓맭봱겶퍟㗣縸Đ鉹ꥢ햪졚�귗鶻竳蜯麉�ਨ艗鲢欚귍듗괼�阨畼ꂍ△㾑뗛煘혪᷍⫴蘥뒓﹄䷴庲퐇熙绪奤亢齁ᚓ볧홡↺κ薁蜝奻ష쩅飾��픰㖁⻦㛏尟읠Ό챔➞眎盯洌帨宩ꖉ�ᇘ㉩塷૭��梱ř弾烤譒捱�삿ѳ鬬褈��儵눱騤듏꽇⍰⃭ꏅႣ錟�ꬢꘙ㶃㨏柖歰ᬍ뤧海춱톎꒾᪡裖玡凊轏䓜榑ꘒ㛈꿯䜆㑏늰箶ࡊ㳞ူ끉惧괼刽耄䈱樇銊뛪�嚫놫Ⅻ湺犷ꕫឝﺷꕫឝ瘊⢂垜ꉫ᪭춴㳗ꡬ穷庭ꊻⶡ쨧뗩뚧뇷ꭺ眨瘩⬭닦뢛穘겶ឥꙘ겶騬뙘겵ꫜ蘫�⬭멻윫覷ꖊ쭢皚�鷇겹룞狗⢞뙖Ꞃ稩饲뚉ꊙ껈ꢞ궨ẞ흚뗩麲욠稧微覫秷ꭺ眞닚ᶒ⦬訉�檷᪺�默鱪�麷겺孬減я�┍皘氒泎⡲紁댴쎚鲅덩နꄱ듻띈뒯ਫ਼㔉煲踭▵뀶瞷洒袠ꨚꚾᨔ☚퓣ځ⫀䎨㒀㙩夿�䷋趞枪蛈笂㺁쓐郌覐䨉聣揝賋鳸ۢ硕튧팆㫸�늁訾繢颢髧눮렕㾋퐊霆ྭ⸛ᣍᐔ惩䑆Z䑝砕⫻쪳眪셅趵礙䶸筠郓꤃覤觿鰍蒸塏�磥◡䡇隓噙㌗ꙣ귀㟢霌⨓䶽ↆ랉䀀緟쬻稟㸈婛ỎΏꝋ㿦껩Ფ㣔喨ퟢ⍤爑、ႀ뫘庞�櫘ꢝឬ멛沋妱芊ₕ駙⊚瞮뚶ꕮ蝲薫ⅶ❧ꋛ�⟲藦鵺뢥榹�槗ꮱ힟櫩涅窶숵쳗⢂ⲥ署니⢢फ़犉鶢暢麇�멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ݞ눨❪ힽ뷟鷻톫⥺릢뛗鶱窻⚶馚詗杞붺⺝재阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脗궺맏櫘嵺멷Ẳ墬뛇训詸⢮ў燨꽹ퟫꉩ抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ▊쭬纺�芊붽�벦옊⢂垜ꉬ⊶ᄒㄳ튉�겋滽㢢⛶듗촹�磟踸뷪觓ⴭ癲⩡窱Ȍ焑䠀ы嶼ᠣሜඹ궳嶼}뱎닛䵼힍贻퍃썍វ稫�⏅ꖫⲂ訠闧⢙�権溋ꝱ請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠痫⊂皭竍篛��᪲鞫騫浹�鷗ꭲ增默꧗붽�藩욭誉텺쮥뛉놂訠闧⢙�驷꺶뚥溇犅ꬡ瘧枢�긧窸ꕩ맧竘幩뇗齪藦鵺뛂㗌휨般ꗺ媲젨ꈉ干覝ꉦꊞ蟝競眞뉘겶쟫꺋궊砨긇庲⠧櫗곗붽�ꬩ窹ꊶ힝뇩�묦뚙骊埫ꉧ庽먮鷇겖⬭뇺鸊⮁វ稫�驚ᱪ塨닝慺娥請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠漩抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸり�뉫椓ᢦ㙺篞隊幾먦痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ≷埍顛듓䴱グ鎹ㆬ뛓張㗓临턗鱺⯞痺训溋ꝶ쬹톹湺ᨬ뗊⛫붴㥯⥢닛ᾮ먮똩렰諘庲歩넲틗愂ᅈ䭮稘⌒ᰍﳣ湺ጘꛣ츶穻�詞纺⚕랫自맧竘鷕ᛝ㓓䱆�阫ⶱꋫ択ਫ脻黛팚쭭㗳廷瓣䴑秇ꊽ꺉鲚వ➝閬麭쨦멹➣৵폝㗡베ꚺ㇋妚詛꞉癖뉺뜨飺ⲵ숫愑⌓㸧砈彺ힰ㬇럨귗꾖⬭뇺鸊⮁㮞�᫋洵盛趴㑞燨꽹ퟫꉦ絷湛麆謭犉뫷콷흝睯✦뉫槂⭡ᄣጾ❍魳彍쩀扺脶淍紜焕㮞�᫋洵盗巴ᜂꊸ귉រ늉샊ꊂ皭몷꿕ꫬ櫈嫛麪登㾷᭜귩嫅귩嫅閦痧�孡ઉ筓궩鷊ᶊ砂ꉻ庞퓲ꗢ❅줺ఠ섕窻⊢烚뗣Ẳ욠碀얮覑秷ꭺ眞넺ኹ룞狔麝䗪旉㨂瀪➵‰ꢞ됷걲뢩똪❅黐�뇩먦䗫ẞ풞鷗ꭅ黔黐鱅黓Ẳ욠碀쮊쭈璸겴瞥꒸겵䧬릻Ხ⛞⸫ⵊ犸魸뢬듺Ⲵ뢬듬❺닢닐⭲禸䃇軇ᱵ憈俅미ᎎ⏲ꜞ୯᪉堩擖ᄒ饮龡웂㗌휨舺렦灝͠ᛁᆧ䝸ﮁ䀰엢評琊쨟⟚䢲騋悳⸔ಫ꠨嶇枩덒䳴騦夨ᰞ쫹Ꮟ珽㖚ℝ焲㡔풟纔♌�츔㯖秇ꊽ꺉ꦢ襵퍍秳굴휆겅휟誋⽺뢳ꉹ�崴힟㫗䵸㚅𥉉벛ꌝ륮稚ⲵ쨦숫慺즭ꛆ錭⯵�茜䑒漆ࣄ蜃湺흯ӆ⦸庞ꊗ龮覥淪륚湹�❵糙뢣䴶Ⲡ뚽飼痫쭬纺�芊닛䵼힝뛣洺퍄請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠䗧�竀耔郾秢飛੮ս柠�꙲綴ꝅ괲ꨎꃇ솑푅鼕渉骊堦権岢悀⯟㷉郒︧翏釩㋕劇ᴦ✛삞쒱栚谦権悙ꢥ犉蓓퀽됄⸸ď鄅싷烻�楪娚雚❺�깋Ტ浺�孭뼝�뛷�㣩ﶼ�︸榧巛갢鷗⢘嫨颺⸅窹孺렞깖鮞瞭ⱪވ෧>鳫減拾瞼㧳黝홖鮞瞭ණ幎닛䵼ힽ뛣崸퍅ⱺ뀠穻䲣㢥閯六梧皌ⰵ㵴텣雫諯ٹ줨ュ㗓䵴픸溝渪�鶼탂垫눪⟗䈧䗪旉㨵鵭뛼矍뭽웛�㓣ꟶ孳쟸齫콵殎ᵷ溰詷岢您黗Ꞵ뚧苦ꁹ䥰➶‛뫇鎆⬡禧庯ڬ槗并�궧⑩뮬窙幪잢鷉湵숫慪粚滫ậ껕삞�滫Ḿ뢦檼螢쭧橧鮣᷵�湺ᨬ뗊♜৭蠆計Ꝫ僨馨Ꞗ⬭뇺鸊⮁瀧똠ᮺ잎긨⊝ꭨ꿰骖垫傀8胸뿣뵶尉ۮ뇤麝Ǘ歺쬃ꉦꊞ嚛鹷굜ᖡ諗ꖊ쭧ꅴꢺ뜞瓓幼㕝⨮귇謶藄옩蠏埍鮊㓓拊୫흊讫燥튢砊璨몷Ḏ⫗䪋ꭱ鷗ꮦ訥흍㗧캵퍜᪲縪ⲽ캉툏뾭痓䵹瓗躸튢砋궆回긇ꮕꛧ鷫園暢鐪⺞�䪋ꭱꖱ薉릵붉ꓭ놅覹떽覤뷠쳄첹覱햕ꆽ췐릍붴ᜮ蜚鐺♪⧲竄깮㞜딗鵺븫庶蒥槉ᲅꧧ穕셹藪�請汾뫨뫘Ꞃ諠峆ꊖ暧嗪觶흟ྭ痩�墬뒸겴蝅䔚⺶⧠痫�試穻斊쭝竹抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸஊ쭔黋鮱쫢淨涶鬿﹘겶쟫꺋궊砨긏�黏�連詛桵窫麲�닛ᾮ먮똩렬릸��닦뢛碸겴蘫��抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸ㾦⩞깦ꊗ뿲폨닙骊孨痫쭬纺�芊⬭ᷩ榙ꢥ뚇庾랪맫ⶖ⬭뇺鸊⮂쮛跧ⶅ⸫ⵊ犸魺᭭ꛏヨ⬭뇺鸊⮃異님Ꝿ违竹骊孨痫ꮞ닙抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸⲹ룞狛윫覷芢筞黔笟窱❲蝢鸆�ઉ筓쪗굻Ꙗꊝ졚껇궺ᚊퟥꌇ鴒뫨껄ꋩ�쥢닛ᾮ먮똩렒穷庭痫�竉抲�꺺⺶⧠ꊸʂ鏛蠍䯌蹋첌ࠍ二่ᐓ䬈ᖚ官�鴈ኘ岙ᩛ蠝��亂辈ᔙ嬛ࠝᯈṛ�蠜ᥛ�᥈ᴚᥞ䠘岙䠝��쮈ዙ岛饛࠙驜鳝ஂ醕퉕젒䠙ᩜ𦒙奈ୈቈᴚᩛ髈ᆔ针᳚ᯝ嬙࠘嬛ᯝ젙鯜蠙ᩙ香岙宝ࠝ峘姙䠛�ᩛ�젂譋䠘宙ࠑ鐓䠘宙ࠕ鎐젘�蠙ᥙ驛驝ᥛṈ᳝尜ᯜ鴈ᴚᩜ쮰ꠈኝ峝ࠛ幈ᯜᩛ驛�讋节錛�节韗ퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟗퟂ餙嶈᭘婛ᩛ駈ᬚ峝ʙᥝ逛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�슚ᴝᰜ캋쯛ᩜ�쮙鲜鯝崚宙쮛�쯛ᩜ�宙鯋�嶂耨⤽뢀풼죤볈샄퓨샤腁㒰腙ꖹ趕말脩藉醥뢁�뷑铨⣸腑閱낁톼臥뷕좁솕뷁놔臑ꆕ藉钁�붹鲸脭闉릕낁馥짍킸⤙崥岁⒁醥춅鷉閔肴脤臑ꆥ리脙䥈臍ꆽ햱邁薱놽�馽좁醥香闉閹킁헍薝钁뷁톥붹첀⢴뒁薹邁㒁薹邁夹ಁ超뢁醕馥릥톕뇤臍헁솽짐臑ꆥ첻脩헍킁뗤膽솥릥붸뢸련⤱뷔⠨⥽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絽絼⦑闘膵薥놥릜膱ꗍ퀩醕�놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鰩ꇑ퇁쳨벽놥췑첹駉즽헑ꖹ鲹뷉鲽놥췑ꖹ馼붑闘�
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
Hi Donald, All, Does FRRouting support keychain for BGP protocol, OSPF, or any plan to support in the future if not already? Thanks, Jay
Jay -
From a quick glance at the source code, it looks like rip and eigrp are the two protocols that have any type of keychain support implemented. I am not aware of anyone working on this support, but in general we would welcome someone implementing this feature.
donald On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Jay Chen <jchen1@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
Hi Donald, All,
Does FRRouting support keychain for BGP protocol, OSPF, or any plan to support in the future if not already?
Thanks, Jay
participants (7)
-
Alistair Woodman -
Donald Sharp -
Jafar Al-Gharaibeh -
Jay Chen -
JP Senior -
Lou Berger -
Vincent Jardin