Thanks for your replies, I actually went through the document/examples for FRR 5.0, but wondering if I could do L3VPN on 4.0, without VRF leaking. In order to do that, I need to attach RD/RT to each VRF, so looking for configuration to configure RD/RT in FRR4.0. thanks - Heidi
On May 31, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
Hi,
Some good examples can also be found in topotest, e.g.,
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/tests/topotests/bgp_l3vpn_to_bg...
but this uses the current RD/RT syntax but I'm unsure of the syntax for 4.0.
Looking back, I suggest trying the following the example from a correspondingly old version of topotest:
https://github.com/FRRouting/topotests/blob/98ced3d021ec0bf03607dc5e2922673f...
Lou
On 5/30/2019 7:23 PM, Heidi net wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to migrate from IOX to FRR4.0. I have a simple configuration of 2 VRFs: red and blue. No VRF route leaking is needed.
I know VRF route leaking was added to FRR5.0. But since I don’t do that. Can FRR4.0 be used to
- Configure 2 VRFs for routes, attach different RD/RT to routes, and advertise routes into corresponding VPNs with FRR4.0? - Any configuration examples?
Below is the current Cisco configuration.
ip vrf red rd 100:101 route-target export 200:101 route-target import 200:101 ! ip vrf blue rd 100:201 route-target export 200:201 route-target import 200:201 ! interface Loopback101 ip vrf forwarding red ! interface Loopback102 ip vrf forwarding blue ! router bgp 100 neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 200 neighbor 10.10.10.2 update-source Loopback0 ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.10.10.2 activate neighbor 10.10.10.2 send-community both exit-address-family ! address-family ipv4 vrf red redistribute connected exit-address-family ! address-family ipv4 vrf blue redistribute connected exit-address-family
thanks - Heidi _______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog