Vivek, Mitesh, 

Thanks a lot for checking. I'll try again once the fix is available.


rendo



On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
Hi Rendo,

I checked the code. As Vivek mentioned, we are missing some commits which unblocks "l2vpn evpn" under non-default VRFs. We should be getting those in with the next PR within a few days.

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
Hi Rendo,

I'll let Mitesh check on and respond to why you are unable to configure the "advertise ipv4 unicast" command. It is possible some commit has been missed. We do have some additional fixes that Mitesh is in the process of submitting. In any case, the idea is to control the injection of EVPN type-5 routes using this command. We're going to support a route-map option also for it in an upcoming commit.

Regarding advertising subnet routes for the locally configured subnets, we're having a rethink on the need for an additional command. The same can be achieved by redistributing connected routes of the VRF into BGP and then using the "advertise ipv4 unicast" command. Control for advertising specific subnets can be currently achieved through use of route-map for the redistribute command, and subsequently, using route-map for the "advertise" command. Our documents aren't updated yet as we haven't concluded on this, however, I recommend that you try out this approach as soon as the "advertise ipv4 unicast" command is working.

Thanks,
Vivek

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:09 PM, rendo <rendo.aw@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Mitesh, 

maybe i am missing something, looks like the cli reject it

linux-93# conf t
linux-93(config)# router bgp 64000 vrf vrf-110
linux-93(config-router)#  address-family l2vpn evpn
Only Unicast and Multicast SAFIs supported in non-core instances.
linux-93(config-router)#

and this is my vrf

linux-93# show ip route vrf vrf-110
Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP,
       O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, P - PIM, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP,
       T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, A - Babel, D - SHARP,
       > - selected route, * - FIB route


VRF vrf-110:
C>* 10.93.193.0/24 is directly connected, ens7, 2d01h49m
C>* 10.93.253.0/24 is directly connected, br110, 2d01h49m


I also tried "advertise-subnet" as mentioned in cumulus doc, the command is rejected too

linux-93(config)# router bgp 64000
linux-93(config-router)# address-family l2vpn evpn
linux-93(config-router-af)# vni 20110
linux-93(config-router-af-vni)# advertise-subnet
% Unknown command.


I tried few other thing, and this is my current config.  It still the same, my instance can receive RT 5 prefix, but it send nothing.

vrf vrf-110
 vni 20110
!

...

router bgp 64000
 coalesce-time 1000
 neighbor 10.0.0.11 remote-as 64000
 neighbor 10.0.0.11 update-source 10.0.0.93
 !
 address-family l2vpn evpn
  neighbor 10.0.0.11 activate
  vni 20110
   route-target import 64000:110
   route-target export 64000:110
   advertise-default-gw
  exit-vni
  vni 10100
   route-target import 64200:100
   route-target export 64200:100
  exit-vni
  advertise-all-vni
  advertise ipv4 unicast
 exit-address-family
 vrf-policy vrf-110
  rt both 64000:901
  exit-vrf-policy
 vnc defaults
  exit-vnc
!
router bgp 64000 vrf vrf-110
 coalesce-time 1000
 !
 address-family ipv4 unicast
  network 0.0.0.0/0
  redistribute kernel
  redistribute connected
  redistribute static
 exit-address-family
!



linux-93# show bgp l2vpn evpn

...
Route Distinguisher: ip 10.0.0.21:110

*>i[5]:[0]:[24]:[10.21.121.0]
                    10.0.1.21                0    100      0 ?
...


*>i[5]:[0]:[24]:[10.25.125.0]
                    10.0.0.25                     100      0 i
Route Distinguisher: ip 10.0.0.93:100

...


Thanks.


rendo



On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Mitesh Kanjariya <mitesh@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
Hi Rendo, 

   You need to enable type-5 route advertisement. Please find an example below. The CLI in red will do the trick.

    router bgp <> vrf <>

        address-family l2vpn evpn

            advertise ipv4 unicast

     exit-address-family

     end


    For reference yo could follow: https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/display/DOCS/Ethernet+Virtual+Private+Network+-+EVPN


On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:02 PM, rendo <rendo.aw@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Donald, 

Thanks for the update and thanks for everyone involved to make this happen. 

Out of my curiosity, I did a quick test, and evpn type 2 looks very good, both control plane and data plane works as expected. 
For type 5, i can see my FRR is able to receive the prefix, but i could not find a way to advertise my local prefix as type 5. Please let me know if you have any doc/pointer for this. 


Thanks.

rendo


On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
All -

EVPN control plane in FRR is now enhanced so that it supports both
asymmetric and symmetric routing models. Prefix-based routing is also
supported using EVPN type-5 routes. Also, with all routing models, L3
multi-tenancy is inherently supported

I'd like to thank Mitesh for his hard work getting this done!

thanks!

donald

_______________________________________________
frog mailing list
frog@lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog




--
Regards,
Mitesh





--
Regards,
Mitesh