Hello Donald, how are you? I understand that it may be a limitation of FRR or some kernels to apply l2vpn mpls, but in this case specifically I would not need FRR to participate in the VPN, the idea is that FRR serves exclusively to be RouteReflector of address-family l2vpn mpls. I will use other routers to effectively make Kompella l2vpn. I know you are an active contributor to the project, do you think this could happen in FRR? Tks ----------------------------------------------- From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> To: Junior Corazza <corazza@telic.com.br> Cc: frog <frog@lists.frrouting.org> Subject: Re: [FROG] L2vpn MPLS AFI Message-ID: <CAK989yfbEGDwG6o5f7tKaPrW2CXmwUS+BS0F1n++xTqNE0XQgA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" FRR does not have the capability of doing `l2vpn mpls` at this point in time. I am not aware of anyone publically working on this feature at this point in time. donald On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Junior Corazza <corazza@telic.com.br> wrote:
Hello people.
I was testing FRR 7.2 to use it as RouteReflecor for l2vpn and l3vpn. The problem is that there is no address family for l2vpn mpls, there is only for evpn.
Can you tell me if it is possible to use RouteReflector for L2vpn Kompella? I mean, is there this feature? If not, can you tell me if this is in the roadmap of the project?
_______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog
------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog ------------------------------ End of frog Digest, Vol 33, Issue 18 ************************************
Sure I expect someone to pick up the work. I just don't have any insight to anyone with a plan to do so around this feature at this time. Not to say it won't happen. donald On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:14 PM Junior Corazza <corazza@telic.com.br> wrote:
Hello Donald, how are you?
I understand that it may be a limitation of FRR or some kernels to apply l2vpn mpls, but in this case specifically I would not need FRR to participate in the VPN, the idea is that FRR serves exclusively to be RouteReflector of address-family l2vpn mpls. I will use other routers to effectively make Kompella l2vpn.
I know you are an active contributor to the project, do you think this could happen in FRR?
Tks
----------------------------------------------- From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com> To: Junior Corazza <corazza@telic.com.br> Cc: frog <frog@lists.frrouting.org> Subject: Re: [FROG] L2vpn MPLS AFI Message-ID: <CAK989yfbEGDwG6o5f7tKaPrW2CXmwUS+BS0F1n++xTqNE0XQgA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
FRR does not have the capability of doing `l2vpn mpls` at this point in time. I am not aware of anyone publically working on this feature at this point in time.
donald
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Junior Corazza <corazza@telic.com.br> wrote:
Hello people.
I was testing FRR 7.2 to use it as RouteReflecor for l2vpn and l3vpn. The problem is that there is no address family for l2vpn mpls, there is only for evpn.
Can you tell me if it is possible to use RouteReflector for L2vpn Kompella? I mean, is there this feature? If not, can you tell me if this is in the roadmap of the project?
_______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog
------------------------------
End of frog Digest, Vol 33, Issue 18 ************************************
participants (2)
-
Donald Sharp -
Junior Corazza