[cmaster-next] [PATCH] bgpd: Fix crashes when no default bgp instance is configured.
Lou Berger
lberger at labn.net
Thu Dec 1 15:17:13 EST 2016
Sigh -- been one of those days - Haven't had time to try to get Martin's
tests running -
Martin,
What extra lines are you referring to?
Lou
On 12/1/2016 3:08 PM, Martin Winter wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 6:15, Donald Sharp wrote:
>> Lou -
>>
>> This fixes the crashes that are found by the new topotest testing
>> suite that Martin has created. As stated in the commit note, I have
>> done no work to ensure that vnc is going to work correctly without a
>> default bgp instance. We just no longer crash with these tests.
>> Additionally I see lots of unguarded debugs in the vnc code. I
>> believe these need to be cleaned up as well in some manner, thoughts?
>>
>> Martin -
>>
>> The bgp tests still fail, from what appears to be display output
>> change. How would you like to proceed here? Send a patch to fix this
>> issue to the topotests github doohickey?
> I brought up this question before. I can fix the test to ignore these
> extra lines, but I’m not sure this is the right way to do it.
>
> Maybe Lou (or someone else) can explain the need/use of this extra
> information and if this is intended or something forgotten from
> development
> and should be removed.
> (I worry about many other users doing screen scraping on this output)
>
> - Martin
>
>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Donald Sharp
>> <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>> The vnc code assumes that bgp must have a default instance.
>>> This code change checks to make sure that we do before
>>> proceeding. It makes no assurances that vnc will behave
>>> correctly without a default instance.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>> bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c | 3 ++-
>>> bgpd/rfapi/vnc_import_bgp.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c b/bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c
>>> index 8783024..77da4f9 100644
>>> --- a/bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c
>>> +++ b/bgpd/rfapi/rfapi_import.c
>>> @@ -4414,7 +4414,8 @@ rfapiProcessPeerDown (struct peer *peer)
>>> */
>>>
>>> bgp = bgp_get_default (); /* assume 1 instance for now */
>>> - assert (bgp);
>>> + if (!bgp)
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> h = bgp->rfapi;
>>> assert (h);
>>> diff --git a/bgpd/rfapi/vnc_import_bgp.c
>>> b/bgpd/rfapi/vnc_import_bgp.c
>>> index 4215ce2..dc2640a 100644
>>> --- a/bgpd/rfapi/vnc_import_bgp.c
>>> +++ b/bgpd/rfapi/vnc_import_bgp.c
>>> @@ -208,12 +208,17 @@ prefix_bag_free (void *pb)
>>> static void
>>> print_rhn_list (const char *tag1, const char *tag2)
>>> {
>>> - struct bgp *bgp = bgp_get_default ();
>>> - struct skiplist *sl = bgp->rfapi->resolve_nve_nexthop;
>>> + struct bgp *bgp;
>>> + struct skiplist *sl;
>>> struct skiplistnode *p;
>>> struct prefix_bag *pb;
>>> int count = 0;
>>>
>>> + bgp = bgp_get_default ();
>>> + if (!bgp)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + sl = bgp->frapi->resolve_nve_nexthop;
>>> if (!sl)
>>> {
>>> zlog_debug ("%s: %s: RHN List is empty", (tag1 ? tag1 : ""),
>>> @@ -251,6 +256,8 @@ vnc_rhnck (char *tag)
>>> struct skiplistnode *p;
>>>
>>> bgp = bgp_get_default ();
>>> + if (!bgp)
>>> + return;
>>> sl = bgp->rfapi->resolve_nve_nexthop;
>>>
>>> if (!sl)
>>> @@ -1798,6 +1805,9 @@ vnc_import_bgp_exterior_add_route_it (
>>> struct bgp *bgp_default = bgp_get_default ();
>>> afi_t afi = family2afi (prefix->family);
>>>
>>> + if (!bgp_default)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> h = bgp_default->rfapi;
>>> hc = bgp_default->rfapi_cfg;
>>>
>>> @@ -1992,6 +2002,9 @@ vnc_import_bgp_exterior_del_route (
>>> afi_t afi = family2afi (prefix->family);
>>> struct bgp *bgp_default = bgp_get_default ();
>>>
>>> + if (!bgp_default)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> memset (&pfx_orig_nexthop, 0, sizeof (struct prefix)); /*
>>> keep valgrind happy */
>>>
>>> h = bgp_default->rfapi;
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
More information about the dev
mailing list