[cmaster-next] stable/2.0 close-down

Donald Sharp sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com
Wed Dec 7 07:12:45 EST 2016


I am fine with this.  David?

donald

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Martin Winter
<mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Dec 2016, at 7:55, David Lamparter wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>> I've just merged Renato's RIP & BGP cleanups, which came with a zebra
>> namespace rework/cleanup.
>>
>> This was pretty much exactly at the limit of what I think was still
>> acceptable for a "stable/" branch, but I'd like to progress clamping
>> down on the "allowed impact" of changes.
>>
>> Donald & I are in agreement that, for "stable/2.0", there should be:
>> - no new features
>
> I would really like to get the needed (small) changes added to be able to
> create snap packages.
> Waiting for Renato on the LDP issue/question on this…
>
> Not sure if this is looked as as a change (and if yes: everyone ok?)
>
> - Martin
>
>
>> - no reworks
>> (Please voice your disagreement if you have any!)
>>
>> On the other hand, please *do* send:
>> - bugfixes in general
>> - bugfixes for regressions
>> - build system fixes
>> - documentation updates
>>
>> However, even bugfixes should hopefully get smaller and smaller now.  We
>> need to make sure the limes converges towards a release :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cmaster-next mailing list
>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>
> _______________________________________________
> cmaster-next mailing list
> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next




More information about the dev mailing list