[dev] Renaming branch stable/3.0 to dev/3.0 ???

[Donald Sharp]

I see Martin's point.  Does anyone else have a suggestion/thought?

donald

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> Lou
>
>
>
> On April 13, 2017 7:18:57 AM "Martin Winter" <mwinter at opensourcerouting.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 12 Apr 2017, at 18:55, Lou Berger wrote:
>>
>>> Alternatively create a release/2.0 ...
>>
>>
>> This would still give the impression that stable/3.0 is a stable
>> version…
>>
>> I rather don’t have stable (or release) in a name until we have
>> something
>> stable.
>>
>> - Martin
>>
>>> On April 12, 2017 9:13:02 PM "Martin Winter"
>>> <mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Curious on an opinion here…
>>>>
>>>> Our branches on the github seem to be confusing to newcomers. Most
>>>> people seem
>>>> to assume stable/3.0 branch (or master) is the one they should be
>>>> building from
>>>> for a stable version.
>>>>
>>>> I don’t see much we can do about the master (except maybe update
>>>> the
>>>> description
>>>> to make it clear that this is the most cutting edge version).
>>>>
>>>> But I would propose we rename stable/3.0 to dev/3.0 until we get to a
>>>> more
>>>> “stable” version of it.
>>>>
>>>> I’m also thinking about having some auto-merge of commits from the
>>>> 3.0
>>>> branch
>>>> into master for the time being (at least for the non-conflicting
>>>> commits) to
>>>> keep master up to date.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> - Martin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dev mailing list
>>>> dev at lists.frrouting.org
>>>> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev