[dev] [FRR TSC] Package Discussion (Doodle for times)

[Lou Berger]

I think both goals are reasonable.  I'm inclined to take the "contentious" 
patch and then discuss alternative / consolidate approaches separately.

Lou


On May 30, 2017 7:10:03 AM "Russ White" <russ at riw.us> wrote:

>
>> The discussion is about https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/378 ?
>
> Yes.
>
>> The packaging process may differ for each distribution, and I think contrary
>> to the core application of frr, the packaging should differ between
>> distributions.
>
> I think what Donald is after is to have the look and feel of the packaging 
> process the same across all distributions -- to not confuse users. Is this 
> a reasonable goal? If so, then we can work out _how_ to do this (one file 
> or many)...
>
>> Martin did a nice job to bootstrap and to try to aggregate packaging, but I
>> would tend to focus on the Debian/Ubuntu ones (startup and .deb).
>
> Maybe we should focus only on Debian & Ubuntu, keeping these two a single 
> look & feel, while leaving the rest to do what they want to do?
>
> 😊 /r
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev