[dev] Northbound work reviews and progress
Quentin Young
qlyoung at cumulusnetworks.com
Fri Dec 6 15:46:10 EST 2019
I think this is appropriate. Probably an hour will be sufficient.
Does the hour before next week's technical meeting work for you?
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:28 AM Santosh P K via dev <dev at lists.frrouting.org>
wrote:
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Santosh P K <sapk at vmware.com>
> To: "dev at lists.frrouting.org" <dev at lists.frrouting.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:27:37 +0000
> Subject: Northbound work reviews and progress
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to know if it makes sense to have a call for all the
> northbound work going on against branch nb_conversions. We have received
> comments for staticd yang PR https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/5460
> we can discuss them as well. We are ready with PIM Yang file which we would
> like to raise PR but before that if we wanted to have common understanding
> of how VRF needs to be handled for protocols.
>
>
>
> There are different data models around and FRR RIP using VRF in different
> way.
>
> 1. In case of IETF – uses VRF at top level and all protocols are under
> that.
> 2. In case of Openconfig – uses VRF at the top level and all protocols
> are under that.
>
>
>
> +--rw network-instances
>
> +--rw network-instance* [name]
>
> +--rw name -> ../config/name
>
> +--rw protocols
>
> +--rw protocol* [identifier name]
>
> +--rw identifier -> ../config/identifier
>
> +--rw name -> ../config/name
>
> +--rw config
>
> | +--rw identifier? identityref
>
> | +--rw name? string
>
> | +--rw enabled? boolean
>
> | +--rw default-metric? uint32
>
> +--ro state
>
> +--ro identifier? identityref
>
> +--ro name? string
>
> +--ro enabled? boolean
>
> +--ro default-metric? uint32
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. In case of FRR rip – uses VRF as a list under RIP.
>
>
>
> module: frr-ripd
>
> +--rw ripd
>
> +--rw instance* [vrf]
>
> +--rw vrf string
>
>
>
>
>
> Also I see that there is a new PR for VRF
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/5492 and we have one defined in
> staticd Yang (as it was not there before). To have common understanding and
> avoid duplicate effort a call would help.
>
>
>
> @Donald Sharp <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> Can we use next week Tuesday
> slot for this discussion? Or shall we schedule a separate meeting on
> Wednesday or Friday? Please do suggest.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Santosh P K
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Santosh P K via dev <dev at lists.frrouting.org>
> To: "dev at lists.frrouting.org" <dev at lists.frrouting.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:28:16 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: [dev] Northbound work reviews and progress
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20191206/d4149a87/attachment.html>
More information about the dev
mailing list