<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Ubuntu">Hello Russ</font>,</p>
<p>Just a point to clarify the new Linux foundation networking fund.
Fees are not coming from project but from members. Members who
wish join this new fund must pay fees to become a Linux Foundation
member (Orange, 6Wind and Cumulus are already silver members). The
amount of fees depends of the level (Platinum, Gold and Silver).
Once done, to become part of this new fund you must pay an
additional fees to this new fund. Again, amount of fees depends of
the level (Platinum, Gold, Silver). So, in any case projects have
to pay something, or I miss understanding the process.</p>
<p>What it is unclear, is the way the new board of the Linux
Foundation Networking fund will allocate funding to projects under
<p>And least, but not last, we will become a shark in the big pond
and agree to protect the small fish ;-)</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 05/12/2017 à 15:10, Russ White a
<pre wrap=""> What I could say, is that Orange is officially a Platinum member
of ONAP and completely support this new initiative from the Linux Foundation.
For us, it is also natural that __all__ Networking projects within the Linux
Foundation will join this new umbrella which, of course, concern FRR despite
that it is a small project compared to ODL, ONAP and others.
Since I cannot attend the meeting today, I want to ask some questions that might be helpful here. In "joining this initiative," I assume this means any funding FRR receives would go completely to the Linux Foundation, and the LF would, in turn, determine how much funding to apportion to each project under this "umbrella" for future operations. The level of funding would, presumably, be tied to the "importance" of the project from the perspective of the LF.
If this is all correct, then I would argue FRR should _not_ join this "umbrella," as it would ultimately pull funding from FRR into other projects, essentially ending the community effort here. Even if what I've described above is only potential, rather than "actual right now," the reality is that the Linux Foundation has "other fish to fry" than making certain FRR is a successful project. The problem with being a small fish in a big pond is the big fish get all the attention, and hence all the money.
At this point, unless someone can explain how the Linux Foundation will put a legal structure in place to ensure FRR receives any funds earmarked specifically for the project, so funds will not be "redirected" into some other project that is deemed "more important," I would say FRR should not join this "umbrella."
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.