<div dir="auto"><div>That's better, 7 PST is a bit too early ATC.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 9, 2019, 12:34 AM Santosh P K <<a href="mailto:sapk@vmware.com">sapk@vmware.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">





<div lang="EN-IN" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_3387534092042686149WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Quentin there were request to postpone this to Wednesday same time as Tuesday call. Does that time work for you?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Thanks<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Santosh P K <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Quentin Young <<a href="mailto:qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Saturday, 7 December 2019 at 2:16 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Santosh P K <<a href="mailto:sapk@vmware.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">sapk@vmware.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [dev] Northbound work reviews and progress<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I think this is appropriate. Probably an hour will be sufficient.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does the hour before next week's technical meeting work for you?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:28 AM Santosh P K via dev <<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Santosh P K <<a href="mailto:sapk@vmware.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">sapk@vmware.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>><br>
Cc: <br>
Bcc: <br>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:27:37 +0000<br>
Subject: Northbound work reviews and progress<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hello All,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">    I would like to know if it makes sense to have a call for all the northbound work going on against branch
</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:#24292e;background:white"> nb_conversions. We have received comments for
</span><span lang="EN-US">staticd yang PR </span><a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFRRouting%2Ffrr%2Fpull%2F5460&data=02%7C01%7Csapk%40vmware.com%7Cbcf6392c09c34722e66a08d77a8d5b8d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637112619859761887&sdata=ZY8%2FEneV8FbTgEUfbEaYEhndMdht9L%2BBhRg3BIv2xM8%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/5460</a>
 we can discuss them as well. We are ready with PIM Yang file which we would like to raise PR but before that if we wanted to have common understanding of  how VRF needs to be handled for protocols.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are different data models around and FRR RIP using VRF in different way.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li class="m_3387534092042686149gmail-m1271225150051122504msolistparagraph">
In case of IETF – uses VRF at top level and all protocols are under that.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_3387534092042686149gmail-m1271225150051122504msolistparagraph">
In case of Openconfig – uses VRF at the top level and all protocols are under that.<u></u><u></u></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">+--rw network-instances</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">     +--rw network-instance* [name]</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">        +--rw name                       -> ../config/name</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">        +--rw protocols</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">           +--rw protocol* [identifier name]</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              +--rw identifier    -> ../config/identifier</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              +--rw name          -> ../config/name</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              +--rw config</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              |  +--rw identifier?       identityref</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              |  +--rw name?             string</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              |  +--rw enabled?          boolean</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              |  +--rw default-metric?   uint32</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">              +--ro state</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">                 +--ro identifier?       identityref</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">                 +--ro name?             string</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">                 +--ro enabled?          boolean</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">                 +--ro default-metric?   uint32</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<ol start="3" type="1">
<li class="m_3387534092042686149gmail-m1271225150051122504msolistparagraph">
In case of FRR rip – uses VRF as a list under RIP. <u></u><u></u></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">module: frr-ripd</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">  +--rw ripd</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">     +--rw instance* [vrf]</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black">        +--rw vrf                              string</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Also I see that there is a new PR for VRF
<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFRRouting%2Ffrr%2Fpull%2F5492&data=02%7C01%7Csapk%40vmware.com%7Cbcf6392c09c34722e66a08d77a8d5b8d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637112619859771883&sdata=v0eBPDLgZwvGCWwKAjWkI5H67kzBPi7%2BkyIdM0Yx9Yg%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/5492</a> and we have one defined in staticd Yang (as it was not there before). To have common understanding and avoid duplicate effort a call would help.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"><span style="text-decoration:none">@Donald Sharp</span></a> Can we use next week Tuesday slot for this discussion? Or
 shall we schedule a separate meeting on Wednesday or Friday? Please do suggest.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Santosh P K
<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Santosh P K via dev <<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a>><br>
Cc: <br>
Bcc: <br>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:28:16 -0800 (PST)<br>
Subject: [dev] Northbound work reviews and progress<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:dev@lists.frrouting.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dev@lists.frrouting.org</a><br>
<a href="https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.frrouting.org%2Flistinfo%2Fdev&data=02%7C01%7Csapk%40vmware.com%7Cbcf6392c09c34722e66a08d77a8d5b8d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637112619859771883&sdata=CPBGXMWLAHwJ%2BRf47HS58pGNHAoUgYRHlEruhmtZfok%3D&reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>

</blockquote></div></div></div>