[FROG] RES: frog Digest, Vol 33, Issue 18

[Junior Corazza]

Hello Donald, how are you?

I understand that it may be a limitation of FRR or some kernels to apply l2vpn mpls, but in this case specifically I would not need FRR to participate in the VPN, the idea is that FRR serves exclusively to be RouteReflector of address-family l2vpn mpls. I will use other routers to effectively make Kompella l2vpn.

I know you are an active contributor to the project, do you think this could happen in FRR?

Tks

-----------------------------------------------
From: Donald Sharp <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Junior Corazza <corazza at telic.com.br>
Cc: frog <frog at lists.frrouting.org>
Subject: Re: [FROG] L2vpn MPLS AFI
Message-ID:
	<CAK989yfbEGDwG6o5f7tKaPrW2CXmwUS+BS0F1n++xTqNE0XQgA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

FRR does not have the capability of doing `l2vpn mpls` at this point in time.  I am not aware of anyone publically working on this feature at this point in time.

donald

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Junior Corazza <corazza at telic.com.br> wrote:
>
> Hello people.
>
> I was testing FRR 7.2 to use it as RouteReflecor for l2vpn and l3vpn. 
> The problem is that there is no address family for l2vpn mpls, there 
> is only for evpn.
>
> Can you tell me if it is possible to use RouteReflector for L2vpn Kompella?
> I mean, is there this feature?
> If not, can you tell me if this is in the roadmap of the project?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> frog mailing list
> frog at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
frog mailing list
frog at lists.frrouting.org
https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog


------------------------------

End of frog Digest, Vol 33, Issue 18
************************************