[FROG] BGP L3VPN support

[Heidi net]

I tried in FRR4.0, got error:
ASW-7001(config-router)# router bgp 65021
ASW-7001(config-router)# add ipv4 vpn 
ASW-7001(config-router-af)# neighbor 11.11.11.2 activate      
ASW-7001(config-router-af)# exit
ASW-7001(config-router)#  vrf-policy cust1
% Unknown command.
ASW-7001(config-router)#

It looks like this “vpn-policy” was introduced in FRR5.0, which I am not in.


Even for 5.0, if i want to configure TWO VRFs (as shown in my IOX configuration). In FRR, do I have to configure 2 BGP instances, and each one has its own vpn-policy, like:

router bgp 6552  vrf red <======== BGP instance 1
  vpn-policy ipv4
>     label 1041
>     rd 10:41
>     rt both 51:100
>    exit


router bop 6552 vrf blue <===== BGP instance 2
   vpn-policy ipv4
>     label 1042
>     rd 10:42
>     rt both 52:100
>    exit



Can I just configure one BGP instance, and have 2 vpn-policy, one for red, one for blue,  under the same BGP instance?


thanks
- Heidi



> On Jun 5, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
> 
> see the example in https://github.com/FRRouting/topotests/blob/98ced3d021ec0bf03607dc5e2922673f2c4b15d2/bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf/r4/bgpd.conf
> 
> e.g., in the bgp vrf config section"
> 
> 
>    vpn-policy ipv4
>     label 1041
>     rd 10:41
>     rt both 52:100
>    exit
> 
> On 6/5/2019 2:24 PM, Heidi net wrote:
>> Thanks for your replies, I actually went through the document/examples for FRR 5.0, but wondering if I could do L3VPN on 4.0, without VRF leaking.
>> 
>> In order to do that, I need to attach RD/RT to each VRF, so looking for configuration to configure RD/RT in FRR4.0.
>> 
>> 
>> thanks
>> - Heidi
>> 
>>> On May 31, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Some good examples can also be found in topotest, e.g.,
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/tests/topotests/bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf/r4/bgpd.conf
>>> 
>>> but this uses the current RD/RT syntax but I'm unsure of the syntax for 4.0.
>>> 
>>> Looking back, I suggest trying the following the example from a correspondingly old version of topotest:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/FRRouting/topotests/blob/98ced3d021ec0bf03607dc5e2922673f2c4b15d2/bgp_l3vpn_to_bgp_vrf/r4/bgpd.conf
>>> 
>>> Lou
>>> 
>>> On 5/30/2019 7:23 PM, Heidi net wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I am trying to migrate from IOX to FRR4.0.   I have a simple configuration of 2 VRFs: red and blue. No VRF route leaking is needed.
>>>> 
>>>> I know VRF route leaking was added to FRR5.0. But since I don’t do that.  Can FRR4.0 be used to
>>>> 
>>>> - Configure 2 VRFs for routes,  attach different RD/RT to routes, and advertise routes into corresponding VPNs with FRR4.0?
>>>> - Any configuration examples?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Below is the current Cisco configuration.
>>>> 
>>>> ip vrf red
>>>>  rd 100:101
>>>>  route-target export 200:101
>>>>  route-target import 200:101
>>>> !
>>>> ip vrf blue
>>>>  rd 100:201
>>>>  route-target export 200:201
>>>>  route-target import 200:201
>>>> !
>>>> interface Loopback101
>>>> ip vrf forwarding red
>>>> !
>>>> interface Loopback102
>>>>  ip vrf forwarding blue
>>>> !
>>>> router bgp 100
>>>>  neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 200
>>>>  neighbor 10.10.10.2 update-source Loopback0
>>>> !
>>>>  address-family vpnv4
>>>>   neighbor 10.10.10.2 activate
>>>>   neighbor 10.10.10.2 send-community both
>>>>   exit-address-family
>>>> !
>>>>  address-family ipv4 vrf red
>>>>  redistribute connected
>>>>  exit-address-family
>>>> !
>>>>  address-family ipv4 vrf blue
>>>>  redistribute connected
>>>>  exit-address-family
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> thanks
>>>> - Heidi
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> frog mailing list
>>>> frog at lists.frrouting.org
>>>> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/frog/attachments/20190605/4b96f4b5/attachment.html>