[FROG] DMVPN(nhrpd) status question

[Timo Teras]

Hi,

strongswan patches are still needed unfortunately. The upstream does
not seem to like them, but have not offered any good alternative
solution either that would scale.

There's been few attempts to request them in the mailing list but
it's been more or less silence from them.

Timo

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:56:04 -0500
Donald Sharp <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:

> I do not know if the patches still need applying and worse the links
> in our documentation for the patches are no longer valid.
> 
> Timo -
> 
> Is it still necessary to patch strongswan, and if so where can we
> point people at the appropriate patches?
> 
> thanks!
> 
> donald
> 
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:47 PM Антон Жаровцев <warm.anton at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> > According to nhrpd docs
> > (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/nhrpd.html) need to patches
> > strongswan to work together with frr/nhrpd but this document has
> > date 2017.
> >
> > Is it still need to apply thous patches on strongswan or fresh
> > versions of FRR and strongswan will work together out of the box
> > now ?
> >
> > B.t.w. 1 month ago I tried to set up nhrp network without ipsec but
> > all traffic went through hubs. I did not try to use strongswan due
> > to need to apply this patch (I don't like patched software on
> > docker containers, it is hard to support it then)
> > _______________________________________________ frog mailing list
> > frog at lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog