Got it. Thanks a lot for the reply Donald. Rgds Atul On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:24 PM Donald Sharp <donaldsharp72@gmail.com> wrote:
This was an intentional design decision at the time of writing pbr from me. I was not sure if people wanted partial pbr-maps or not. I could see arguments for both sides so I erred on the side of being too zealous. If you need different behavior add a knob in that allows it.
donald
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:55 PM Atul Chowdhry <atul77@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Guys, I was looking at PBR daemon code and looks like in current code, the whole pbr-policy (struct pbr_map) is considered to invalid if any one of the contained rules (struct pbr_map_sequence) inside the policy becomes invalid. I cannot figure the reason for this design choice. To me it looks like policy rules are pretty much independent and policy is just a container for these rules. What am I missing? I will really appreciate it if anyone can reply to my query.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Rgds Atul
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev