[cmaster-next] stable/2.0 close-down

[David Lamparter]

Try a "make clean && make", might be resulting from leftover stale bits.

-David

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:28:47PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> is vtysh not building a known issue?
> 
> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(command.o):(.data.rel.local+0xf00): multiple
> definition of `banner_motd_file_cmd'
> vtysh_user.o:(.data.rel.local+0x0): first defined here
> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple definition
> of `interface_desc_cmd'
> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x19e0): first defined here
> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x40): multiple
> definition of `no_interface_desc_cmd'
> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1a20): first defined here
> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(routemap.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple
> definition of `route_map_cmd'
> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1060): first defined here
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> 
> On 12/7/2016 12:10 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> > stable/2.0 if it's a bug fix
> >
> > master if new feature
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
> >> so what should patches go against now, 2.0 or master?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/7/2016 7:12 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> >>> I am fine with this.  David?
> >>>
> >>> donald
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Martin Winter
> >>> <mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
> >>>> On 5 Dec 2016, at 7:55, David Lamparter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've just merged Renato's RIP & BGP cleanups, which came with a zebra
> >>>>> namespace rework/cleanup.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was pretty much exactly at the limit of what I think was still
> >>>>> acceptable for a "stable/" branch, but I'd like to progress clamping
> >>>>> down on the "allowed impact" of changes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Donald & I are in agreement that, for "stable/2.0", there should be:
> >>>>> - no new features
> >>>> I would really like to get the needed (small) changes added to be able to
> >>>> create snap packages.
> >>>> Waiting for Renato on the LDP issue/question on this…
> >>>>
> >>>> Not sure if this is looked as as a change (and if yes: everyone ok?)
> >>>>
> >>>> - Martin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> - no reworks
> >>>>> (Please voice your disagreement if you have any!)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On the other hand, please *do* send:
> >>>>> - bugfixes in general
> >>>>> - bugfixes for regressions
> >>>>> - build system fixes
> >>>>> - documentation updates
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, even bugfixes should hopefully get smaller and smaller now.  We
> >>>>> need to make sure the limes converges towards a release :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -David
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
> >>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> >>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cmaster-next mailing list
> >>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> >>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cmaster-next mailing list
> >>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> >>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cmaster-next mailing list
> >> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> >> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cmaster-next mailing list
> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next