[cmaster-next] stable/2.0 close-down

Lou Berger lberger at labn.net
Wed Dec 7 14:56:08 EST 2016


it fails with  ./configure '--enable-static' '--disable-shared'

(yes I did a   rm -rf * ; git reset --hard ; ./bootstrap.sh)

On 12/7/2016 12:38 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
> Try a "make clean && make", might be resulting from leftover stale bits.
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:28:47PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
>> is vtysh not building a known issue?
>>
>> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(command.o):(.data.rel.local+0xf00): multiple
>> definition of `banner_motd_file_cmd'
>> vtysh_user.o:(.data.rel.local+0x0): first defined here
>> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple definition
>> of `interface_desc_cmd'
>> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x19e0): first defined here
>> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(if.o):(.data.rel.local+0x40): multiple
>> definition of `no_interface_desc_cmd'
>> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1a20): first defined here
>> ../lib/.libs/libzebra.a(routemap.o):(.data.rel.local+0x0): multiple
>> definition of `route_map_cmd'
>> vtysh.o:(.data.rel.local+0x1060): first defined here
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>
>>
>> On 12/7/2016 12:10 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
>>> stable/2.0 if it's a bug fix
>>>
>>> master if new feature
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Lou Berger <lberger at labn.net> wrote:
>>>> so what should patches go against now, 2.0 or master?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/7/2016 7:12 AM, Donald Sharp wrote:
>>>>> I am fine with this.  David?
>>>>>
>>>>> donald
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Martin Winter
>>>>> <mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2016, at 7:55, David Lamparter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've just merged Renato's RIP & BGP cleanups, which came with a zebra
>>>>>>> namespace rework/cleanup.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was pretty much exactly at the limit of what I think was still
>>>>>>> acceptable for a "stable/" branch, but I'd like to progress clamping
>>>>>>> down on the "allowed impact" of changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Donald & I are in agreement that, for "stable/2.0", there should be:
>>>>>>> - no new features
>>>>>> I would really like to get the needed (small) changes added to be able to
>>>>>> create snap packages.
>>>>>> Waiting for Renato on the LDP issue/question on this…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if this is looked as as a change (and if yes: everyone ok?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - no reworks
>>>>>>> (Please voice your disagreement if you have any!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the other hand, please *do* send:
>>>>>>> - bugfixes in general
>>>>>>> - bugfixes for regressions
>>>>>>> - build system fixes
>>>>>>> - documentation updates
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, even bugfixes should hopefully get smaller and smaller now.  We
>>>>>>> need to make sure the limes converges towards a release :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cmaster-next mailing list
>>>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>>>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cmaster-next mailing list
>> cmaster-next at lists.nox.tf
>> https://lists.nox.tf/listinfo/cmaster-next





More information about the dev mailing list