[dev] Renaming branch stable/3.0 to dev/3.0 ???

Lou Berger lberger at labn.net
Wed Apr 12 21:55:29 EDT 2017


Alternatively create a release/2.0 ...

Lou


On April 12, 2017 9:13:02 PM "Martin Winter" 
<mwinter at opensourcerouting.org> wrote:

> Curious on an opinion here…
>
> Our branches on the github seem to be confusing to newcomers. Most
> people seem
> to assume stable/3.0 branch (or master) is the one they should be
> building from
> for a stable version.
>
> I don’t see much we can do about the master (except maybe update the
> description
> to make it clear that this is the most cutting edge version).
>
> But I would propose we rename stable/3.0 to dev/3.0 until we get to a
> more
> “stable” version of it.
>
> I’m also thinking about having some auto-merge of commits from the 3.0
> branch
> into master for the time being (at least for the non-conflicting
> commits) to
> keep master up to date.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev





More information about the dev mailing list