[dev] Question about EVPN route types

[Philippe Guibert]

Hi,

You are welcome to bring some EVPN extended features, namely EVPN type
1 and EVPN type 4
Thanks,

Philippe

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Jay Chen <jchen1 at paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
> Thank you, currently our potential customers seem immediate interest is type-2 (maybe type-3 too). if they need type-1, type-4 probably later phase (for multicast multi-home), we can develop too. We will sync up by then. Currently we just started integrate FRR (POC).
>
> Thanks,
> Jay
>
>
> On 3/26/18, 4:16 PM, "Donald Sharp" <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>     The relevant documentation for this is here:
>
>     https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__frrouting.org_user-2Dguide_zebra.html-23zebra-2Dfib-2Dpush-2Dinterface&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka-A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=EhNk5Ru9bF27ttPaQDHa0wwdnj9irBs7XMzveLSpXW8&e=
>
>     On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Donald Sharp
>     <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>     > I believe some vendors have plans for adding more evpn types.  I
>     > cannot speak for them regarding their time schedules.
>     >
>     > For FPM build FRR with `--enable-fpm` added on the configure line.
>     > Zebra FPM has two choices for fpm forwarding netlink or protobuf
>     > forwarding.  If you want protobuf, use '--enable-protobuf` in
>     > configure, else only netlink is used as a communication medium.  To
>     > load the appropriate module use -M fpm:netlink or -M fpm:protobuf
>     >
>     > donald
>     >
>     > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Jay Chen <jchen1 at paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
>     >> Hi all,
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I got a question about what EVPN route types are supported already in the
>     >> latest version. It looks like type-2, type-3, and type-5 are supported.
>     >> Type-1, and type-4 are not yet. If it is true, any plan the missing types
>     >> are going to be supported?
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Another quick question, the fpm/fpm_pb.c file looks empty. Is there a
>     >> missing patch need to be patched? It will be very helpful if anyone can
>     >> point to a brief example how fpm is used by a switch that has a hardware
>     >> forwarding path?
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Thanks,
>     >>
>     >> Jay
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> dev mailing list
>     >> dev at lists.frrouting.org
>     >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.frrouting.org_listinfo_dev&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFWe5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka-A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=SV_20pt83P-0JYpAhkGoz0lKCPHRJrjFRI4Flbv6X8I&e=
>     >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev