[dev] Question about EVPN route types

Vivek Venkatraman vivek at cumulusnetworks.com
Wed Mar 28 17:17:19 EDT 2018


Hi Jay,

I'd say the same as Philippe. We at Cumulus are looking into the type-1 and
type-4 route implementation, but welcome other efforts also.

Cheers,
Vivek

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Philippe Guibert <
philippe.guibert at 6wind.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You are welcome to bring some EVPN extended features, namely EVPN type
> 1 and EVPN type 4
> Thanks,
>
> Philippe
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Jay Chen <jchen1 at paloaltonetworks.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you, currently our potential customers seem immediate interest is
> type-2 (maybe type-3 too). if they need type-1, type-4 probably later phase
> (for multicast multi-home), we can develop too. We will sync up by then.
> Currently we just started integrate FRR (POC).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jay
> >
> >
> > On 3/26/18, 4:16 PM, "Donald Sharp" <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >     The relevant documentation for this is here:
> >
> >     https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> frrouting.org_user-2Dguide_zebra.html-23zebra-2Dfib-
> 2Dpush-2Dinterface&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW
> e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka-
> A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=EhNk5Ru9bF27ttPaQDHa0wwdnj9irB
> s7XMzveLSpXW8&e=
> >
> >     On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Donald Sharp
> >     <sharpd at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> >     > I believe some vendors have plans for adding more evpn types.  I
> >     > cannot speak for them regarding their time schedules.
> >     >
> >     > For FPM build FRR with `--enable-fpm` added on the configure line.
> >     > Zebra FPM has two choices for fpm forwarding netlink or protobuf
> >     > forwarding.  If you want protobuf, use '--enable-protobuf` in
> >     > configure, else only netlink is used as a communication medium.  To
> >     > load the appropriate module use -M fpm:netlink or -M fpm:protobuf
> >     >
> >     > donald
> >     >
> >     > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Jay Chen <
> jchen1 at paloaltonetworks.com> wrote:
> >     >> Hi all,
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> I got a question about what EVPN route types are supported
> already in the
> >     >> latest version. It looks like type-2, type-3, and type-5 are
> supported.
> >     >> Type-1, and type-4 are not yet. If it is true, any plan the
> missing types
> >     >> are going to be supported?
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> Another quick question, the fpm/fpm_pb.c file looks empty. Is
> there a
> >     >> missing patch need to be patched? It will be very helpful if
> anyone can
> >     >> point to a brief example how fpm is used by a switch that has a
> hardware
> >     >> forwarding path?
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> Thanks,
> >     >>
> >     >> Jay
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> dev mailing list
> >     >> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> >     >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> frrouting.org_listinfo_dev&d=DwIBaQ&c=V9IgWpI5PvzTw83UyHGVSoW3Uc1MFW
> e5J8PTfkrzVSo&r=yetdj-aXQpuqTCJGs-93hOpK3740MIRXowfUNLByeos&m=SU_xZPka-
> A2WpWQD4P7IFqQXwDxuo9qVwQAd-c1WIcU&s=SV_20pt83P-
> 0JYpAhkGoz0lKCPHRJrjFRI4Flbv6X8I&e=
> >     >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev at lists.frrouting.org
> > https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20180328/d936a4d1/attachment.html>


More information about the dev mailing list