[dev] Question about EVPN route types

Jeff Tantsura jefftant at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 13:00:12 EDT 2018


Vincent,

Nothing in particular, what you see is IANA EVPN route type registry, stuff that potentially would need to be implemented.
Types 6-11 are multicast related and perhaps less interesting for DC focused implementation.

That’s all,
Jeff  

> On Mar 29, 2018, at 00:12, Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin at 6wind.com> wrote:
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> What do you mean? Anyone is welcomed to provide patch series to be innovative on these topics.
> 
> IETF RFC / drafts are welcomed since the are the specs of the implementations but even better having proven code that allows to understand and play with the specs will help to build up solutions. 
> 
> I believe FRR has proven and demonstrated that it can be faster to support protocol extensions.
> 
> Please?
> 
> Thank you, 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20180329/e0ba61fc/attachment.html>


More information about the dev mailing list