[dev] Question on PBR daemon

[Donald Sharp]

This was an intentional design decision at the time of writing pbr from
me.  I was not sure if people wanted partial pbr-maps or not.  I could see
arguments for both sides so I erred on the side of being too zealous.  If
you need different behavior add a knob in that allows it.

donald

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:55 PM Atul Chowdhry <atul77 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> I was looking at PBR daemon code and looks like in current code, the whole
> pbr-policy (struct pbr_map) is considered to invalid if any one of the
> contained rules (struct pbr_map_sequence) inside the policy becomes invalid.
> I cannot figure the reason for this design choice. To me it looks like
> policy rules are pretty much independent and policy is just a container for
> these rules.
> What am I missing?
> I will really appreciate it if anyone can reply to my query.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> Rgds
> Atul
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at lists.frrouting.org
> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20210326/d309f61b/attachment.htm>