- frog - lists.frrouting.org

EIGRP not working in 7.3/7.4 releases
by Amol Lad 10 Aug '20

10 Aug '20

Hi, First, thank you for integrating FRR in OpenWrt. I used the latest FRR package in OpenWrt (which is FRR 7.4 release). I'm trying to configure EIGRP but it seems the "network" command is not configuring the correct network. For example, see below steps. I'm configuring "network 172.16.1.0/24" under eigrp but the running config shows "network 255.255.255.0/24" I'm not sure if this is OpenWrt specific issue or a general issue and I'll try release 7.3/7.4 on Ubuntu tomorrow. But please let me know if you latest FRR release and can successfully configure EIGRP. Thanks Amol root@arm-linux:/# vtysh Hello, this is FRRouting (version 7.4). Copyright 1996-2005 Kunihiro Ishiguro, et al. arm-linux# do show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration: ! frr version 7.4 frr defaults traditional hostname arm-linux log syslog ! password zebra ! access-list vty seq 5 permit 127.0.0.0/8 access-list vty seq 10 deny any ! line vty access-class vty ! end arm-linux# configure terminal arm-linux(config)# router eigrp 1 arm-linux(config-router)# network 172.16.1.0/24 arm-linux(config-router)# do show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration: ! frr version 7.4 frr defaults traditional hostname arm-linux log syslog ! password zebra ! router eigrp 1 network 255.255.255.0/24 ! access-list vty seq 5 permit 127.0.0.0/8 access-list vty seq 10 deny any ! line vty access-class vty ! end

2 2

[BUG] [BGP] command of `show ip bgp sum` shows ipv6 neighbors in ipv4 address-family
by Simon Jones 06 Aug '20

06 Aug '20

Hi all, I'm using frr-7.2.1-s3, I found command of `show ip bgp sum` shows ipv6 neighbors in ipv4 address-family, like this. Is this a bug? ``` dut-testbed(config-router)# do show ip bgp ipv6 summary IPv6 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 13313 RIB entries 12007, using 2158 KiB of memory Peers 3, using 61 KiB of memory Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd fc00::76 4 64600 3606 6686 0 0 0 00:20:06 6002 fc00::7a 4 64600 3605 6686 0 0 0 00:20:06 6002 fc00::7e 4 64600 3605 6686 0 0 0 00:20:05 6002 Total number of neighbors 3 dut-testbed(config-router)# do show ip bgp ipv4 summary IPv4 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 12008 RIB entries 12011, using 2158 KiB of memory Peers 8, using 163 KiB of memory Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.0.0.57 4 64600 3610 3414 0 0 0 00:20:17 6002 10.0.0.59 4 64600 3610 3417 0 0 0 00:20:17 6002 10.0.0.61 4 64600 3610 3417 0 0 0 00:20:17 6002 10.0.0.63 4 64600 3610 3414 0 0 0 00:20:17 6002 fc00::72 4 64600 6 18 0 0 0 never Idle fc00::76 4 64600 3609 6690 0 0 0 00:20:15 NoNeg fc00::7a 4 64600 3609 6690 0 0 0 00:20:15 NoNeg fc00::7e 4 64600 3608 6689 0 0 0 00:20:14 NoNeg Total number of neighbors 8 dut-testbed(config-router)# address-family ipv6 dut-testbed(config-router-af)# neighbor fc00::72 activate dut-testbed(config-router-af)# do show ip bgp ipv4 summary IPv4 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 12008 RIB entries 12011, using 2158 KiB of memory Peers 8, using 163 KiB of memory Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.0.0.57 4 64600 3617 3421 0 0 0 00:20:39 6002 10.0.0.59 4 64600 3617 3424 0 0 0 00:20:39 6002 10.0.0.61 4 64600 3617 3424 0 0 0 00:20:39 6002 10.0.0.63 4 64600 3617 3421 0 0 0 00:20:39 6002 fc00::72 4 64600 6 18 0 0 0 never Idle fc00::76 4 64600 3616 6697 0 0 0 00:20:37 NoNeg fc00::7a 4 64600 3616 6697 0 0 0 00:20:37 NoNeg fc00::7e 4 64600 3616 6697 0 0 0 00:20:36 NoNeg Total number of neighbors 8 dut-testbed(config-router-af)# do show ip bgp ipv4 summary IPv4 Unicast Summary: BGP router identifier 10.1.0.32, local AS number 65100 vrf-id 0 BGP table version 12008 RIB entries 12011, using 2158 KiB of memory Peers 8, using 163 KiB of memory Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.0.0.57 4 64600 3618 3422 0 0 0 00:20:41 6002 10.0.0.59 4 64600 3618 3425 0 0 0 00:20:41 6002 10.0.0.61 4 64600 3618 3425 0 0 0 00:20:41 6002 10.0.0.63 4 64600 3618 3422 0 0 0 00:20:41 6002 fc00::72 4 64600 3212 20 0 0 0 00:00:01 NoNeg fc00::76 4 64600 3617 6698 0 0 0 00:20:39 NoNeg fc00::7a 4 64600 3616 6698 0 0 0 00:20:39 NoNeg fc00::7e 4 64600 3616 6698 0 0 0 00:20:38 NoNeg ``` ---- Simon Jones

5 5

BFD question
by Operations 05 Aug '20

05 Aug '20

Hi, We are new to this mailing list and to FRR. Currently we are looking into enabling and configuring BFD. We've run into an issue and can not start the BFD daemon; when running manually we get the error: # /usr/lib/frr/bfdd -F traditional -A 127.0.0.1 --log-level debug 2020/08/05 16:36:14 emergencies: BFD: udp6-shop: socket: Address family not supported by protocol IPv6 support is explicitly disabled via kernel boot parameter. Is there a way (that I missed in the documentation) to disable IPv6 altogether in bfdd? We are running FRRouting v7.3.1 from the official repo. Any help is much appreciated! Best regards, -- Zsolt Gurmai NOC Red Matter Ltd. Operations Team +44 333 150 2890 +1 646 586 2159 +61 282 443 020 +852 5808 0256 +65 3163 4091 Emergency Number +44 134 423 1535 E-mail operations(a)redmatter.com

2 1

Pottential bugs RPKI States at FRR 7.3.1 (debian packages)
by Dewangga Alam 02 Aug '20

02 Aug '20

Hello! I am new at FRR, and trying to found a reference that indicated (bugs?) or miss configuration at version 7.3.1 using debian buster packages from http://deb.frrouting.org (%3Ca) class="" style="text-decoration:none !important;border-bottom: 1px dotted #3A9AFC !important">deb.frrouting.org (http://http://deb.frrouting.org (%3Ca) class="" style="text-decoration:none !important;border-bottom: 1px dotted #3A9AFC !important">deb.frrouting.org) Here’s our configuration: https://pastebin.com/xKE3AJij Already adjusted bgpd using rpki options, and when I restart frr service, the tagging was not working. > vtysh > sh bgp ipv4 103.241.24.0 BGP routing table entry for 103.241.24.0/24 Paths: (3 available, best #3, table default) Not advertised to any peer 38515 58820 ((null)) 103.28.75.36 from 103.28.75.0 (103.28.75.0) Origin IGP, localpref 5100, valid, internal Last update: Sat Aug 1 10:54:34 (canary:event?ts=617946879.00) 2020 38515 58820 ((null)) 103.28.75.36 from 103.28.74.255 (103.28.74.255) Origin IGP, localpref 5100, valid, internal Last update: Sat Aug 1 10:54:34 (canary:event?ts=617946879.00) 2020 38515 58820 ((null)) 103.28.75.36 from 103.28.74.129 (103.28.74.127) Origin IGP, localpref 5100, valid, internal, best (Router ID) Community: 38515:58820 Last update: Sat Aug 1 10:54:34 (canary:event?ts=617946879.00) 2020 The rpki states aren’t show, and when I paste the route-map configuration into vtysh, the loc-pref tag are valids and working. The full command pasted here: https://pastebin.com/n3VY4gNm Any hints to fix this issue ? Any helps are appreciated. Thanks in advance! Many thanks. -- Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)

1 0

How to use BMP in frr-7.2
by Simon Jones 30 Jul '20

30 Jul '20

Hi all, I'm using BMP in frr-7.2 But I got errors like this ``` BJ-GH-M1F203-B02-TEST-12(config-router)# bmp targets BT % [BGP] Unknown command: bmp targets BT ``` Where is my command wrong? Thank you~ ---- Simon Jones

2 4

ISIS inter-area L1-L2 redistribution
by Paul HENG 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

Hello, I'm trying to setup the following topology using IS-IS: R5 (49.0003) / \ / \ R2 ----------------- R3 (49.0001) (49.0002) | | | | R1 R4 (49.0001) (49.0002) R1 and R4 are L1 routers, R2/R3 are L1-2 and R5 is L2 only. For a specific area everything seems to be working, but R2 and R3 do not send the routes that they learnt by R1 (resp. R4) to the other areas. Is this feature supported ? (simply with IS-IS, no segment routing or other things). Here are the configs from R1 and R2 : https://pastebin.com/sHkE1Ea9 https://pastebin.com/geMV2ybQ Thanks in advance, Paul

1 0

Reg: Questions about FRR config management
by Thilak Thankappan 16 Jul '20

16 Jul '20

Hello, community, I went through the FRR docs, and I see the VTYSH session touching upon this topic in the context of the CLI shell. It also takes about using domain sockets to communicate with each domain. What is the recommended way to configure FRR programmatically? Thank you in advance for pointing me in the right direction! Thanks, Thilak

1 0

Re: [FROG] VRRP setup with netplan on Ubuntu 20.04
by Oliver O'Boyle 11 Jul '20

11 Jul '20

Not really, no. This was simple enough and I prefer to keep as close to netplan as possible as I suspect macvlan will eventually be supported. I could be swayed with the right argument, I suppose... O. On July 7, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Chriztoffer Hansen <ch(a)ntrv.dk> wrote: Dear Oliver, On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 22:04, Oliver O'Boyle <oliver.oboyle(a)gmail.com> wrote: > To close the loop: > > I ended up going down the /etc/networkd-dispatcher route. I put: > > [ -e /etc/network/if-up.d ] && /bin/run-parts /etc/network/if-up.d > exit 0 > > into a script in that directory, then: > > if ip link show vlan2049 | grep -sq 'state UP'; then > ip link add vlan2049-4 link vlan2049 addrgenmode random type > macvlan mode bridge > ip link set dev vlan2049-4 address 00:00:5e:00:01:01 > ip addr add 192.168.145.194/26 dev vlan2049-4 > ip link set dev vlan2049-4 up > > ip link add vlan2049-6 link vlan2049 addrgenmode random type > macvlan mode bridge > ip link set dev vlan2049-6 address 00:00:5e:00:02:01 > ip addr add 2610:139:c001:3f:1801:f20a::5/64 dev vlan2049-6 > ip link set dev vlan2049-6 up > fi > exit 0 > > into /etc/network/if-ip.d/ > > I figured this would allow someone not familiar with the workaround to > perhaps more easily figure out what was happening. > > It works well enough, but it's ugly AF... I'll probably make it a bit > smarter now, but it works. You never considered going down the system-networkd route? -- Cheers, CHRIZTOFFER _______________________________________________ frog mailing list frog(a)lists.frrouting.org https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog

2 5

VRRP setup with netplan on Ubuntu 20.04
by Oliver O'Boyle 08 Jul '20

08 Jul '20

Hello, I'm looking to set up VRRP via frr 7.3.1 as per http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/vrrp.html I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 which uses Netplan to configure interfaces. Can the macvlan devices be defined in the netplan config file or do I need to run a separate config/set of command to create the devices I need? Any help would be much appreciated. Oliver

3 6

Re: [FROG] Is there any material describing the souce code of ospd6d？
by Quentin Young 29 Jun '20

29 Jun '20

Sadly, no. If you have specific questions I suggest joining our community slack channel and asking in #development. On Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 2:16 AM yan via frog <frog(a)lists.frrouting.org> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <yanhc519(a)aliyun.com> > To: frog <frog(a)lists.frrouting.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:12:06 +0800 > Subject: Is there any material describing the souce code of ospd6d？ > Hi, all. > > I want to read the ospf6d souce code to do a porting to an embedded > platform. However, I found it difficult to understand some data structure, > such as ospf6_lsdb, route_table and route_node. Is there any material > describing these data structrue? > > Thanks > > York > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: yan via frog <frog(a)lists.frrouting.org> > To: frog <frog(a)lists.frrouting.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:12:06 +0800 > Subject: [FROG] Is there any material describing the souce code of ospd6d？ > _______________________________________________ > frog mailing list > frog(a)lists.frrouting.org > https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog >

2 1