- frog - lists.frrouting.org

frr doesn't start on Freeebsd
by Dimitris Kalogeras 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

Hi to all of you, I am trying to establish an initial setup of FRR on a freebsd box. I have followed the instructions on https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/doc/Building_FRR_on_FreeBSD11.… . The software was built tested and installed without any problems. However when I try to run vtysh or vtysh -b, I receive exiting: failed to connect to any daemons. How do I initialize daemons ? Is there any script ? All of my configuration files are in /usr/local/etc/frr. What is the proper sequence of commands ? Cheers, Dimitris [root@router-test2 /usr/local/etc/frr]# ls -l total 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 655 Jun 14 20:11 babeld.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 bgpd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 622 Jun 14 20:11 bgpd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 2801 Jun 14 20:11 bgpd.conf.sample2 -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 1889 Jun 14 20:11 bgpd.conf.vnc.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 186 Jun 14 20:11 eigrpd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 19:58 frr.conf -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 isisd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 789 Jun 14 20:11 isisd.conf.sample -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 650 Jun 14 20:11 ldpd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 ospf6d.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 1110 Jun 14 20:11 ospf6d.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 ospfd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 182 Jun 14 20:11 ospfd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 pimd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 939 Jun 14 20:11 pimd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 ripd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 406 Jun 14 20:11 ripd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 ripngd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 390 Jun 14 20:11 ripngd.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frrvty 0 Jun 14 20:12 vtysh.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 128 Jun 14 20:11 vtysh.conf.sample -rw-r----- 1 frr frr 0 Jun 14 20:12 zebra.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 frr frr 369 Jun 14 20:11 zebra.conf.sample -- Χαιρετισμούς, Δημήτρης Καλογεράς Ερευνητής Β' ΕΠΙΣΕΥ -- Dimitrios K. Kalogeras Electrical Engineer Ph.D. Network Engineer NTUA/ICCS _____________________________________ skype: aweboy voice: +30-210-772 1863 fax: +30-210-772 1866

2 5

Re: [FROG] Getting Started...
by Richard J Palmer 14 Jun '17

14 Jun '17

OK I have done that .... BUT after restarting I am now seeing .... ZEBRA: netlink-cmd (NS 0) error: Invalid argument, type=RTM_NEWROUTE(24), seq=1554090, pid=0 repeated lots of times - I am trying a reboot (as that has cleared this before ....). And after a reboot those errors have gone ... NOW I know this is normally down to the kernel routing table size... BUT I have as yet not found guidance on how to set this correctly for routers. I'm actually willing to pay for some help getting these running correctly as a one off if anyone would be interested in helping / advising ... I think the setup is close here ... Just trying to determine what I am missing ... Thanks in advance Richard Richard Palmer | Director | Merula Limited Company Registered in England and Wales No. 3243995 5 Avro Court, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 6XS Phone 01480 222940 | Support 0845 330 0666 Support Email support(a)merula.net > --- Original message --- > Subject: Re: [FROG] Getting Started... > From: Donald Sharp <sharpd(a)cumulusnetworks.com> > To: Richard J Palmer <richard(a)merula.net> > Cc: <frog(a)lists.frrouting.org> > Date: Tuesday, 13/06/2017 2:21 AM > > Run ./configure with a --enable-multipath=X Where X is not 1. > > donald > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Richard J Palmer <richard(a)merula.net> > wrote: >> >> Hi there >> >> I am testing FRR as an alternative to Quagga on what is a very busy >> core >> router - with multiple full table BGP Sessions. >> >> I am currently using this on Slackware 14.2 ... I have things up and >> running >> and some of the quagga bugs seem to have been cleared which is a PLUs >> BUT I >> am seeing oddness - most obviosuly with IPv6. >> >> Running a traceroute from a server behind it is alternating between >> >> traceroute6 l.root-servers.net >> traceroute to l.ROOT-SERVERS.NET (2001:500:9f::42) from >> 2a00:1940:0:1::78, >> 30 hops max, 24 byte packets >> 1 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.647 ms 0.389 ms >> 0.425 ms >> 2 2a00:1940:0:1::67 (2a00:1940:0:1::67) 0.454 ms 0.565 ms 2.283 >> ms >> 3 2001:7f8:17::8480:1 (2001:7f8:17::8480:1) 0.753 ms 0.662 ms >> 0.728 ms >> 4 2a00:1a80:0:1::5:2 (2a00:1a80:0:1::5:2) 7.458 ms 5.662 ms >> 5.59 ms >> 5 l.root-servers.net (2001:500:9f::42) 5.727 ms 5.722 ms 5.726 >> ms >> >> and >> >> traceroute6 l.root-servers.net >> traceroute to l.ROOT-SERVERS.NET (2001:500:9f::42) from >> 2a00:1940:0:1::78, >> 30 hops max, 24 byte packets >> 1 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.481 ms * 0.682 ms !N >> 2 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.614 ms !N 0.54 ms !N >> 0.529 >> ms !N >> >> The zebta.log file is filled with lines like: >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d1::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d2::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d3::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d4::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d5::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d6::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d7::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d8::/48 >> has 2 >> nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 >> >> and so on.... >> >> What am I missing here - I am sure it is probbay something really >> obvious >> ... >> >> Can you help point me the right way ? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> >> Richard Palmer | Director | Merula Limited >> Company Registered in England and Wales No. 3243995 >> 5 Avro Court, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 6XS >> Phone 01480 222940 | Support 0845 330 0666 >> Support Email support(a)merula.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> frog mailing list >> frog(a)lists.frrouting.org >> https://lists.frrouting.org/listinfo/frog >>

2 1

Getting Started...
by Richard J Palmer 13 Jun '17

13 Jun '17

Hi there I am testing FRR as an alternative to Quagga on what is a very busy core router - with multiple full table BGP Sessions. I am currently using this on Slackware 14.2 ... I have things up and running and some of the quagga bugs seem to have been cleared which is a PLUs BUT I am seeing oddness - most obviosuly with IPv6. Running a traceroute from a server behind it is alternating between traceroute6 l.root-servers.net traceroute to l.ROOT-SERVERS.NET (2001:500:9f::42) from 2a00:1940:0:1::78, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets 1 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.647 ms 0.389 ms 0.425 ms 2 2a00:1940:0:1::67 (2a00:1940:0:1::67) 0.454 ms 0.565 ms 2.283 ms 3 2001:7f8:17::8480:1 (2001:7f8:17::8480:1) 0.753 ms 0.662 ms 0.728 ms 4 2a00:1a80:0:1::5:2 (2a00:1a80:0:1::5:2) 7.458 ms 5.662 ms 5.59 ms 5 l.root-servers.net (2001:500:9f::42) 5.727 ms 5.722 ms 5.726 ms and traceroute6 l.root-servers.net traceroute to l.ROOT-SERVERS.NET (2001:500:9f::42) from 2a00:1940:0:1::78, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets 1 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.481 ms * 0.682 ms !N 2 lon1-gw1.merula.net (2a00:1940:0:1::70) 0.614 ms !N 0.54 ms !N 0.529 ms !N The zebta.log file is filled with lines like: 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d1::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d2::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d3::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d4::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d5::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d6::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d7::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 2017/06/13 02:11:01 ZEBRA: zread_ipv6_add: Prefix 2402:2700:d8::/48 has 2 nexthops, but we can only use the first 1 and so on.... What am I missing here - I am sure it is probbay something really obvious ... Can you help point me the right way ? Thanks! Richard Richard Palmer | Director | Merula Limited Company Registered in England and Wales No. 3243995 5 Avro Court, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE29 6XS Phone 01480 222940 | Support 0845 330 0666 Support Email support(a)merula.net

2 2

OSPF no working frr 3.0+
by Алексей Болдырев 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

Router1: ! frr version 3.1-dev-frr1 frr defaults traditional no log monitor username cumulus nopassword ! service integrated-vtysh-config ! log syslog informational ! router bgp 65301 neighbor 10.247.0.1 remote-as 65500 ! address-family ipv4 unicast network 10.194.0.0/21 exit-address-family ! address-family ipv6 unicast network 2a01:d0:c353:180::/58 neighbor 10.247.0.1 activate exit-address-family vnc defaults response-lifetime 3600 exit-vnc ! router ospf ospf router-id 10.0.250.1 network 10.0.250.0/24 area 0 ! router ospf6 interface eth1 area 0.0.0.0 ! ip route 10.194.0.0/21 Null0 ipv6 route 2a01:d0:c353:180::/58 Null0 ! mpls label global-block 16 8092 ! line vty ! end router 2: Current configuration: ! frr version 3.1-dev frr defaults traditional no log monitor username cumulus nopassword ! service integrated-vtysh-config ! log file /var/log/frr/frr.log ! log timestamp precision 6 ! log syslog informational ! router ospf ospf router-id 10.0.250.10 redistribute static network 10.0.250.0/24 area 0 ! ip route 10.194.2.0/24 Null0 ! line vty ! end Router 1: border# sh ip ospf route ============ OSPF network routing table ============ N 10.0.250.0/24 [10] area: 0.0.0.0 directly attached to eth1 ============ OSPF router routing table ============= ============ OSPF external routing table =========== border# sh ip route Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, P - PIM, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP, T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, > - selected route, * - FIB route K>* 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.247.0.1, eth0 O 10.0.250.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth1, 02:14:23 C>* 10.0.250.0/24 is directly connected, eth1 S>* 10.194.0.0/21 [1/0] is directly connected, Null0, bh C>* 10.194.0.0/24 is directly connected, null0 B 10.247.0.0/24 [20/0] via 10.247.0.1 inactive, 02:14:21 C>* 10.247.0.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 B>* 10.247.1.0/24 [20/0] via 10.247.0.1, eth0, 02:14:21 B>* 10.247.2.0/24 [20/0] via 10.247.0.1, eth0, 02:14:21 B>* 10.247.203.0/24 [20/0] via 10.247.0.1, eth0, 02:14:21 B>* 10.247.204.0/24 [20/0] via 10.247.0.1, eth0, 02:14:2 Router2: s1# sh ip route Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, P - PIM, E - EIGRP, N - NHRP, T - Table, v - VNC, V - VNC-Direct, > - selected route, * - FIB route K>* 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.0.250.1, eth0 O 10.0.250.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:32:18 C>* 10.0.250.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 C>* 10.194.1.0/24 is directly connected, eth1 S>* 10.194.2.0/24 [1/0] is directly connected, Null0, bh s1# Ospf not working! It seems to me that this is a bug, since with quagga and the old version of frr everything worked.

1 0

Howe to start frrouting (or quagga) daemons?
by AJ NOURI 31 May '17

31 May '17

After installing frrouting: ./configure make make install created a user+group 'frr' and gave access to the state and config files/direcotries as mentione in FRROUTING CONFIGURATION (following ./configure) Looks like the service is not started and such '*quagga*' or '*frr*' services don't exist. and '*vtysh*' gives: vtysh: error while loading shared libraries:* libfrr.so.0*: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory So how to start the routing daemons?

2 3

Install frrouting inside Docker container
by AJ NOURI 30 May '17

30 May '17

I am trying to install frrouting on a docker container (ubuntu-based) and I am still fighting againt dependency hell. I have already installed : readline autoconf libtool libjson-c-dev tar build-essential libxml2 libxml-libxml-perl dialog pkg-config libglib2.0-dev But I am stuck with "libcares", which I cannot find as a package: ------------------ configure: error: Package requirements (libcares) were not met: No package 'libcares' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables CARES_CFLAGS and CARES_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. ------------------ Any hint?

2 1

Current state of MPLS for FRR?
by William George 28 May '17

28 May '17

I'm in the tenuous position of trying to re-learn MPLS and BGP for an actual (largely cisco based) carrier network, as well as evaluate how FRR or other OSS projects might be integrated in the future. Doing these in parallel is... challenging :) Looking at the docs on https://frrouting.org/ it's not *exactly* clear what the current state is. I notice in the tests for LDP, there's a number of "all-fails", but I'm not familiar enough w/ the protocol to know whether those are strictly necessary for a working implementation. I was going to add that I wasn't sure if the "vpnv4" address family was supported but I found this <https://frrouting.org/user-guide/BGP-Address-Family.html#index-show-ip-bgp-…>. It explicitly calls out the supported RFCs, so I guess we're good there (though it should probably be noted in the "supported RFCs" page. If the contribution process is simple enough I'll probably submit a pull request). So the BGP support seems to be there, and LDP seems "mostly" complete, whatever that means. Does that mean FRR can actually integrate with a functioning MPLS network? How "production ready" should this be considered? Similarly, though I know this isn't exactly the responsibility of FRR, can anyone give me an idea of the state of open hardware support for MPLS? >From what I've seen so far, it's actually rather lacking, but I'm not confident I'm looking in the right places. Last thing I want to do is add an MPLS node that's going to punt every MPLS frame to CPU or something :) Thanks in advance -- William R. George

3 2

FRR for MPLS in OpenVswitch
by Алексей Болдырев 18 May '17

18 May '17

Can Frrouting be used for MPLS, which is implemented in OpvnVsvich? For example, to automatically distribute MPLS labels.

3 2

Announcing tab completion of interface names, prefix-lists, route-maps and BGP peer names
by Donald Sharp 15 May '17

15 May '17

All - We have pushed the ability for tab completion of interface names, prefix-lists, route-maps and BGP peer names into the master branch. For a quick demo of this feature watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sbgdZRJNJ0 I'd like to thank David for getting this feature into FRR. thanks! donald

1 0

Ubuntu 16.04 and PIMd
by Vladimir V Romadin 13 May '17

13 May '17

2 1