- dev - lists.frrouting.org

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for freerangerouting/frr
by scan-admin＠coverity.com 02 May '19

02 May '19

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to freerangerouting/frr found with Coverity Scan. 11 new defect(s) introduced to freerangerouting/frr found with Coverity Scan. New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 11 of 11 defect(s) ** CID 1479721: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /ripngd/ripng_interface.c: 187 in ripng_if_down() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479721: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /ripngd/ripng_interface.c: 187 in ripng_if_down() 181 182 if (ri->running) { 183 if (IS_RIPNG_DEBUG_EVENT) 184 zlog_debug("turn off %s", ifp->name); 185 186 /* Leave from multicast group. */ >>> CID 1479721: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Dereferencing null pointer "ripng". 187 ripng_multicast_leave(ifp, ripng->sock); 188 189 ri->running = 0; 190 } 191 192 return 0; ** CID 1479720: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479720: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /isisd/fabricd.c: 389 in fabricd_calculate_fabric_tier() 383 384 if (!furthest_from_remote) { 385 zlog_info("OpenFabric: Found no furthest node in remote spf"); 386 isis_spftree_del(remote_tree); 387 return ISIS_TIER_UNDEFINED; 388 } else { >>> CID 1479720: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array "furthest_from_remote->N.id" of 7 bytes by passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 7. 389 zlog_info("OpenFabric: Found %s as furthest from remote dist == %" 390 PRIu32, rawlspid_print(furthest_from_remote->N.id), 391 furthest_from_remote->d_N); 392 } 393 394 int64_t tier = furthest_from_remote->d_N - furthest_t0->d_N; ** CID 1479719: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479719: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /pimd/pim_vxlan.c: 351 in pim_vxlan_orig_mr_up_add() 345 nht_p.u.prefix4 = up->upstream_addr; 346 pim_delete_tracked_nexthop(vxlan_sg->pim, 347 &nht_p, up, NULL); 348 } 349 pim_upstream_ref(up, flags, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); 350 vxlan_sg->up = up; >>> CID 1479719: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Passing "vxlan_sg" to "pim_vxlan_orig_mr_up_iif_update", which dereferences null "vxlan_sg->iif". 351 pim_vxlan_orig_mr_up_iif_update(vxlan_sg); 352 } else { 353 up = pim_upstream_add(vxlan_sg->pim, &vxlan_sg->sg, 354 vxlan_sg->iif, flags, 355 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, NULL); 356 vxlan_sg->up = up; ** CID 1479718: (BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING) /zebra/zebra_dplane.c: 1709 in intf_addr_update_internal() /zebra/zebra_dplane.c: 1737 in intf_addr_update_internal() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479718: (BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING) /zebra/zebra_dplane.c: 1709 in intf_addr_update_internal() 1703 zns = zebra_ns_lookup(ifp->vrf_id); 1704 dplane_ctx_ns_init(ctx, zns, false); 1705 1706 /* Init the interface-addr-specific area */ 1707 memset(&ctx->u.intf, 0, sizeof(ctx->u.intf)); 1708 >>> CID 1479718: (BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING) >>> Calling strncpy with a maximum size argument of 20 bytes on destination array "ctx->u.intf.ifname" of size 20 bytes might leave the destination string unterminated. 1709 strncpy(ctx->u.intf.ifname, ifp->name, sizeof(ctx->u.intf.ifname)); 1710 ctx->u.intf.ifindex = ifp->ifindex; 1711 ctx->u.intf.prefix = *(ifc->address); 1712 1713 if (if_is_broadcast(ifp)) 1714 ctx->u.intf.flags |= DPLANE_INTF_BROADCAST; /zebra/zebra_dplane.c: 1737 in intf_addr_update_internal() 1731 ctx->u.intf.flags |= DPLANE_INTF_HAS_LABEL; 1732 1733 /* Use embedded buffer if it's adequate; else allocate. */ 1734 len = strlen(ifc->label); 1735 1736 if (len < sizeof(ctx->u.intf.label_buf)) { >>> CID 1479718: (BUFFER_SIZE_WARNING) >>> Calling strncpy with a maximum size argument of 32 bytes on destination array "ctx->u.intf.label_buf" of size 32 bytes might leave the destination string unterminated. 1737 strncpy(ctx->u.intf.label_buf, ifc->label, 1738 sizeof(ctx->u.intf.label_buf)); 1739 ctx->u.intf.label = ctx->u.intf.label_buf; 1740 } else { 1741 ctx->u.intf.label = strdup(ifc->label); 1742 } ** CID 1479717: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479717: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /pimd/pim_vxlan.c: 947 in pim_vxlan_term_mr_oif_update() 941 if (PIM_DEBUG_VXLAN) 942 zlog_debug("vxlan SG %s term oif changed from %s to %s", 943 vxlan_sg->sg_str, 944 vxlan_sg->term_oif ? vxlan_sg->term_oif->name : "-", 945 ifp ? ifp->name : "-"); 946 >>> CID 1479717: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Passing "vxlan_sg" to "pim_vxlan_term_mr_del", which dereferences null "vxlan_sg->term_oif". 947 pim_vxlan_term_mr_del(vxlan_sg); 948 vxlan_sg->term_oif = ifp; 949 pim_vxlan_term_mr_add(vxlan_sg); 950 } 951 952 void pim_vxlan_add_term_dev(struct pim_instance *pim, ** CID 1479716: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) /pimd/pim_vxlan.c: 267 in pim_vxlan_orig_mr_up_iif_update() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479716: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) /pimd/pim_vxlan.c: 267 in pim_vxlan_orig_mr_up_iif_update() 261 pim_scan_individual_oil(vxlan_sg->up->channel_oil, 262 vif_index); 263 264 if (PIM_DEBUG_VXLAN) 265 zlog_debug("vxlan SG %s orig mroute-up updated with iif %s vifi %d", 266 vxlan_sg->sg_str, >>> CID 1479716: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) >>> Null-checking "vxlan_sg->iif" suggests that it may be null, but it has already been dereferenced on all paths leading to the check. 267 vxlan_sg->iif?vxlan_sg->iif->name:"-", vif_index); 268 269 } 270 271 /* For every VxLAN BUM multicast group we setup a SG-up that has the following 272 * "forced properties" - ** CID 1479715: API usage errors (USE_AFTER_FREE) /ospfd/ospf_network.c: 239 in ospf_sock_init() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479715: API usage errors (USE_AFTER_FREE) /ospfd/ospf_network.c: 239 in ospf_sock_init() 233 if (ret < 0) 234 flog_err(EC_LIB_SOCKET, 235 "Can't set pktinfo option for fd %d", 236 ospf_sock); 237 } 238 >>> CID 1479715: API usage errors (USE_AFTER_FREE) >>> Passing closed handle "ospf_sock" as an argument to "setsockopt_so_sendbuf". 239 setsockopt_so_sendbuf(ospf_sock, bufsize); 240 setsockopt_so_recvbuf(ospf_sock, bufsize); 241 242 ospf->fd = ospf_sock; 243 return ret; ** CID 1479714: Security best practices violations (DC.WEAK_CRYPTO) /lib/typesafe.c: 194 in typesafe_skiplist_add() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479714: Security best practices violations (DC.WEAK_CRYPTO) /lib/typesafe.c: 194 in typesafe_skiplist_add() 188 { 189 size_t level = SKIPLIST_MAXDEPTH, newlevel, auxlevel; 190 struct sskip_item *prev = &head->hitem, *next, *auxprev, *auxnext; 191 int cmpval; 192 193 /* level / newlevel are 1-counted here */ >>> CID 1479714: Security best practices violations (DC.WEAK_CRYPTO) >>> "random" should not be used for security related applications, as linear congruential algorithms are too easy to break. 194 newlevel = __builtin_ctz(random()) + 1; 195 if (newlevel > SKIPLIST_MAXDEPTH) 196 newlevel = SKIPLIST_MAXDEPTH; 197 198 next = NULL; 199 while (level >= newlevel) { ** CID 1479713: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479713: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) /zebra/zebra_vty_clippy.c: 208 in show_ip_nht() 202 } 203 #if 1 /* anything that can fail? */ 204 if (_failcnt) 205 return CMD_WARNING; 206 #endif 207 #endif >>> CID 1479713: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Passing null pointer "type" to "show_ip_nht_magic", which dereferences it. 208 return show_ip_nht_magic(self, vty, argc, argv, ipv4, ipv6, type, addr, addr_str, vrf_name, vrf_all); 209 } 210 211 /* show_route => "show < ip$ipv4 <fib$fib|route> [vrf <NAME$vrf_name|all$vrf_all>] [{ tag (1-4294967295) |A.B.C.D/M$prefix longer-prefixes |supernets-only$supernets_only }] [< RR_IP_REDIST_STR_ZEBR$type_str |ospf$type_str (1-65535)$ospf_instance_id >] |ipv6$ipv6 <fib$fib|route> [vrf <NAME$vrf_name|all$vrf_all>] [{ tag (1-4294967295) |X:X::X:X/M$prefix longer-prefixes }] [RR_IP6_REDIST_STR_ZEBR$type_str] > [json$json]" */ 212 DEFUN_CMD_FUNC_DECL(show_route) 213 #define funcdecl_show_route static int show_route_magic(\ ** CID 1479712: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479712: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /isisd/fabricd.c: 375 in fabricd_calculate_fabric_tier() 369 370 if (!second_furthest_t0) { 371 zlog_info("OpenFabric: Could not find two T0 routers"); 372 return ISIS_TIER_UNDEFINED; 373 } 374 >>> CID 1479712: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array "furthest_t0->N.id" of 7 bytes by passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 7. 375 zlog_info("OpenFabric: Found %s as furthest t0 from local system, dist == %" 376 PRIu32, rawlspid_print(furthest_t0->N.id), furthest_t0->d_N); 377 378 struct isis_spftree *remote_tree = 379 isis_run_hopcount_spf(area, furthest_t0->N.id, NULL); 380 ** CID 1479711: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) /pimd/pim_zebra.c: 1012 in igmp_source_forward_start() ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *** CID 1479711: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) /pimd/pim_zebra.c: 1012 in igmp_source_forward_start() 1006 grp.u.prefix4 = sg.grp; 1007 1008 up = pim_upstream_find(pim, &sg); 1009 if (up) { 1010 memcpy(&nexthop, &up->rpf.source_nexthop, 1011 sizeof(struct pim_nexthop)); >>> CID 1479711: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) >>> Calling "pim_ecmp_nexthop_lookup" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 8 out of 9 times). 1012 pim_ecmp_nexthop_lookup(pim, &nexthop, &src, 1013 &grp, 0); 1014 if (nexthop.interface) 1015 input_iface_vif_index = 1016 pim_if_find_vifindex_by_ifindex( 1017 pim, ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To view the defects in Coverity Scan visit, https://u2389337.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=08onrYu34A-2BWcWUl-2F-2BfV0V0…

1 0

Data Structure changes
by Donald Sharp 01 May '19

01 May '19

All - We recently added some new data structure implementations in lib, thanks to David Lamparter for his work here. The new documentation is here: http://docs.frrouting.org/projects/dev-guide/en/latest/lists.html And we have some commits that convert current usages to the new data structures: 7c198e4e1 lib: use DECLARE_SKIPLIST for timers instead of pqueue c284542b6 lib: use DECLARE_LIST for thread_list 679b1649c lib: use DECLARE_HASH for qobj hash In addition we have a PR for switching some data structures around in zebra: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/4236 Which shows some tremendous memory savings, just by converting over. While it may not be feasible to convert the code base quickly I would like to ensure that the expectation is that new development uses these new data structures. I will be asking the question of 'why are you not using the new data structures' in PR's that introduce new work going forward. thanks! donald

1 0

ask for Ubuntu 19.04 (disco) support.
by xiaoyu.net 30 Apr '19

30 Apr '19

Hello, I am using ubuntu 19.04, i want to ask for get this support, how i do it? Ign:7 https://deb.frrouting.org/frr disco InRelease Err:8 https://deb.frrouting.org/frr disco Release 404 Not Found [IP: 185.142.180.129 443] Reading package lists... Done E: The repository 'https://deb.frrouting.org/frr disco Release' does not have a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. ***************************************************** Best Service and Trustworthy From Us Our Mail Server Support IPv6 & IPv4 Mail ======================================================

1 0

discard interface warnings on FreeBSD
by Mike Tancsa 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

I have been using the discard interface - DISC(4) - on FreeBSD for some time to tie down supernets. On frr7, I am getting a warning message at startup I am not sure what to make of The nic is configured as # ifconfig disc0 disc0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 65532 inet 10.128.128.144 netmask 0xfffffff8 inet 10.129.129.1 netmask 0xfffffff0 inet6 2001:db8::1 prefixlen 64 inet6 fe80::1%disc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 groups: disc nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> And at startup, I get /usr/local/etc/rc.d/frr start Checking zebra.conf 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309141] warning: interface disc0 broadcast addr 10.128.128.144/29 != calculated 10.128.128.151, routing protocols may malfunction 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309141] warning: interface disc0 broadcast addr 10.129.129.1/28 != calculated 10.129.129.15, routing protocols may malfunction 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309105] Disabling MPLS support (no kernel support) OK Starting zebra. 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309141] warning: interface disc0 broadcast addr 10.128.128.144/29 != calculated 10.128.128.151, routing protocols may malfunction 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309141] warning: interface disc0 broadcast addr 10.129.129.1/28 != calculated 10.129.129.15, routing protocols may malfunction 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 4043309105] Disabling MPLS support (no kernel support) If I use the same IP info on another non discard interface it works / doesnt complain. Also, when starting staticd, I get these warnings as well. Checking staticd.conf 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra 2019/04/26 15:58:44 warnings: STATIC: void static_zebra_nht_register(struct static_route *, _Bool): Failure to send nexthop to zebra OK Starting staticd. Looking at the installed routes, it looks ok, except for one which I must be missing something obvious, but its ok on quagga and frr6 I have interface igb1.6: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=600703<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6> ether 90:e2:ba:01:37:81 inet6 fe80::92e2:baff:fe01:3781%igb1.6 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xe inet 64.7.149.177 netmask 0xfffffffc broadcast 64.7.149.179 and a static route of ip route 10.87.1.0/30 64.7.149.178 It ends up installing this static route on the discard interface for some reason on frr7. On frr6, it works. next hop is 64.7.149.178. I do get the same warning messages however at startup. On frr5, its the same as frr7. # vtysh -c "show ip route 10.87.1.0/30" Routing entry for 10.87.1.0/30 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0, best Last update 00:00:14 ago 64.7.149.178 (recursive) * 10.129.129.1, via disc0 kernel confirms # netstat -nr | grep ^10.87.1. 10.87.1.0/30 10.129.129.1 UG1 disc0 # Any ideas what up ? As this is just a test box, there is no MAC addr for the next hop, but would it not mark the route as inactive rather than change the next hop to the discard interface ? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203 Sentex Communications, mike(a)sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada

3 2

some questions about zebra in frr
by sudhanshu kumar 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

Hi, I have 2 questions about zebra in frr. 1. why do we maintain 2 types (source and destination route type) in zebra. I am not sure what source route type means ? Is it the source of the route (like the packet source or the neighbor from which the route got learnt) ? 2. How does frr routing stack interact with SONIC platform. I see that it has a TCP socket with SONIC which it uses to send messages for all protocols. Is it true ? Thanks, Sudhanshu ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: sudhanshu kumar <sudhanshu22(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:06 PM Subject: help: frr interaction with SONIC To: <dev-request(a)lists.frrouting.org> Hi, I would like to know how does frr routing stack interact with SONIC platform. I see that it has a TCP socket with SONIC which it uses to send messages for all protocols. Is it true ? Thanks & Regards, Sudhanshu

2 3

Request to join Development Mailing List
by Rakesh Garg 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information of Mavenir Systems, Inc. or its affiliates and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any review, use or distribution of this information is absolutely prohibited and we request that you delete all copies in your control and contact us by e-mailing to security(a)mavenir.com. This message contains the views of its author and may not necessarily reflect the views of Mavenir Systems, Inc. or its affiliates, who employ systems to monitor email messages, but make no representation that such messages are authorized, secure, uncompromised, or free from computer viruses, malware, or other defects. Thank You

1 0

Anyone using FPM and netlink encoding?
by Donald Sharp 24 Apr '19

24 Apr '19

Hi! I've been asked about netlink encoding that the FPM uses and it's possible expansion to include more data that we have in the rib. If you are using this please respond here and let us know. We would like to talk with you about expanding the api. thanks! donald

1 0

Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (trusty) Packages
by Sullivan (US), Scott C 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Looking for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (trusty) FRR packages for arm64. When following the install directions for building and installing FRR for Ubuntu 14.04, I can successfully compile/install, however get the following error when trying to start FRR: smc@SHARC16-WG1:~/frr$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Release: 14.04 Codename: trusty Architecture = aarch64 smc@SHARC16-WG1:~/frr$ sudo /etc/init.d/frr start Loading capability module if not yet done. 2019/04/11 17:43:58 errors: ZEBRA: libyang: Invalid arguments (ly_ctx_get_node()). 2019/04/11 17:43:58 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 100663321] nb_load_callbacks: unknown data path: `▒ core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group libfrr core_handler: memstats: Host config : 1 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Command Tokens : 594 * 56 core_handler: memstats: Command Token Text : 483 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Command Token Help : 483 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Command Argument Name : 47 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Graph : 7 * 4 core_handler: memstats: Graph Node : 721 * 16 core_handler: memstats: Hash : 20 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Hash Bucket : 179 * 16 core_handler: memstats: Hash Index : 10 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Hook entry : 2 * 28 core_handler: memstats: Link List : 4 * 20 core_handler: memstats: Link Node : 11 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Logging : 1 * 56 core_handler: memstats: Temporary memory : 1 * 9 core_handler: memstats: Northbound Node : 5 * 320 core_handler: memstats: Priority queue : 1 * 20 core_handler: memstats: Priority queue data : 1 * 128 core_handler: memstats: Privilege information : 2 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Thread master : 3 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Thread Poll Info : 2 * 4096 core_handler: memstats: Vector : 1459 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Vector index : 1459 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: YANG module : 1 * 24 core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group Label Manager core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group zebra core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group Table Manager /etc/init.d/frr: line 117: 20327 Aborted ${SSD} --start --pidfile=`pidfile $dmn` --exec "$D_PATH/$dmn" -- `eval echo "$""$dmn""_options"` Thanks, Scott

2 1

Reg ospfclient api issue
by kotesh 15 Apr '19

15 Apr '19

Hi, I am trying to invoke ospfclientapi through ospfclient application. I am seeing following error. Any clue if i am missing something? ./ospfclient evr_4d07_vfemu-linux1 10 250 20 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 ospf_apiclient_connect: sync connect failed Connecting to OSPF daemon on evr_4d07_vfemu-linux1 failed! I have added opaque-lsa config under router ospf. Thanks, Kotesh babu.Chundu

2 1

Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (trusty) Packages
by Sullivan (US), Scott C 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

Looking for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (trusty) FRR packages for arm64. When following the install directions for building and installing FRR for Ubuntu 14.04, I can successfully compile/install, however get the following error when trying to start FRR: smc@SHARC16-WG1:~/frr$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS Release: 14.04 Codename: trusty smc@SHARC16-WG1:~/frr$ sudo /etc/init.d/frr start Loading capability module if not yet done. 2019/04/11 17:43:58 errors: ZEBRA: libyang: Invalid arguments (ly_ctx_get_node()). 2019/04/11 17:43:58 warnings: ZEBRA: [EC 100663321] nb_load_callbacks: unknown data path: `▒ core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group libfrr core_handler: memstats: Host config : 1 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Command Tokens : 594 * 56 core_handler: memstats: Command Token Text : 483 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Command Token Help : 483 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Command Argument Name : 47 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Graph : 7 * 4 core_handler: memstats: Graph Node : 721 * 16 core_handler: memstats: Hash : 20 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Hash Bucket : 179 * 16 core_handler: memstats: Hash Index : 10 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Hook entry : 2 * 28 core_handler: memstats: Link List : 4 * 20 core_handler: memstats: Link Node : 11 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Logging : 1 * 56 core_handler: memstats: Temporary memory : 1 * 9 core_handler: memstats: Northbound Node : 5 * 320 core_handler: memstats: Priority queue : 1 * 20 core_handler: memstats: Priority queue data : 1 * 128 core_handler: memstats: Privilege information : 2 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Thread master : 3 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: Thread Poll Info : 2 * 4096 core_handler: memstats: Vector : 1459 * 12 core_handler: memstats: Vector index : 1459 * (variably sized) core_handler: memstats: YANG module : 1 * 24 core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group Label Manager core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group zebra core_handler: showing active allocations in memory group Table Manager /etc/init.d/frr: line 117: 20327 Aborted ${SSD} --start --pidfile=`pidfile $dmn` --exec "$D_PATH/$dmn" -- `eval echo "$""$dmn""_options"` Thanks, Scott

2 1